On Friday 02 September 2005 16:52, Anton Farygin wrote: > >>>> This is correct ?
I'm not sure if this is correct to move the code from cpp to header file. I think we should remove the inline definition and use normal functions instead of inline. Inline is a replacement for time critical macros and this is also only a proposal for the compiler. I didn't take a deeper look in the code. Don't see currently a reason why not use a normal function here. > >>> Which state of the CVS? > >> > >> HEAD > >> > >>> Did the CVS from tag VERSION_10_10_0 works for > >>> you? If not, pleas send a patch with the changes. Thanks. > >> > >> may be VERSION_0_10_10 ? > >> > >> Permissions denied for anonymous :-( > >> > >> $ cvs up -rVERSION_0_10_10 > >> Password: cvs [server aborted]: cannot write > >> /cvsroot/powersave/CVSROOT/val-tags: Permission denied > > > > What the ... is that? > > Anonymous user cannot checkout TAGS? Not needed too assign a bug. This need to long until a fix is there. ;) We should contact them directly. The tagged version of (K)powersave is available as tar.bz2 at sf.net. > > We need to assign a bug to the forge project ... > > > > Could you please send a patch for HEAD then. There shouldn't be any > > changes in this area recently. > > attached. Did you tried to remove the inline mark? Cheers, Danny _______________________________________________ powersave-devel mailing list [email protected] http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
