---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: Proposal for resolving powernowd/apmd vs. (k)powersave conflict Date: Monday 13 March 2006 23:51 From: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kubuntu Developer Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Luka Renko wrote: >>>>> * Build against libcpufreq0 which uses libsysfs2. Closes: #354738 >>>> >>>> libcpufreq has to be recompiled to pick up the now location of the >>>> libtool la file of libsysfs. This is a problem of cpufrequtils and it's >>>> probably best to file a bug report or request a binNMU for cpufrequtils. >>>> It's not a problem of powersave. >>> >>> I am now following you on this - which package is supposed to install >>> /lib/libsysfs.la? libsysfs-dev? >> >> Yes, but it has moved to /usr/lib/libsysfs.la. That's why cpufrequtils >> chould be rebuilt to pick up this new location. > > But I do not have cpufrequtils installed. Should powersaved depend on > it (at least build)? Of course it should (and it does, look into debian/control, there is a build dependency on libcpufreq-dev). The problem is the following: Previous versions of libsysfs installed the libsysfs.la into /lib/libsyfs.la. When libcpufreq0 was compiled, libtool recorded a dependency on /lib/libsysfs.la in /usr/lib/libcpufreq.la. Later the maintainer of libsysfs decided to move the la file to /usr/lib/, whereas /usr/lib/libcpufreq.la still thinks it is in /lib. That's why libcpufreq0 (cpufrequtils) has to be rebuilt. The best is, to file a bug report against cpufrequtils. Cheers, Michael ------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ powersave-devel mailing list [email protected] http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
