On Tuesday 11 April 2006 11:03, Luka Renko wrote: > Hello, > > I know that this discussion was already going on, but there is new momentum > as g-p-m is being proposed to be included in core GNOME. > See this thread: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00006.html
We already did notice this discussion. ;-) > As you can see, there was mentioned that KDE folks did not want to have > cross-desktop daemon - I thought that powersave could become one. I also thought powersave could become a cross-desktop discussion, but the answers of Richard Hughes and some other ppl on the list looks for me as if a useful targeted discussion is not possible. They want to do their stuff and have no real interest in a common cross-desktop daemon and a open discussion. But this is _my_ impression, maybe I'm wrong. > As I am pushing powersave/kpowersave into (K)ubuntu, I would for sure like > to see more cooperation between two power management systems. I would like also see more cooperation, but after this thread and the reaction of the gnome guys (including the g-p-m maintainer) I'm pessimistic also if there are ppl which whish e.g. a seperate daemon (see e.g. mail from Davyd Madeley). If we would like to find a way to get a common cross-desktop daemon (or at least a common well defined DBUS-powermanagement interface), we need more people reporting this whish and discuss this topic. Cheers, Danny _______________________________________________ powersave-devel mailing list [email protected] http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
