Am Montag, 10. Juli 2006 16:05 schrieb Stefan Seyfried: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 06:36:14AM -0700, Andre Srinivasan wrote: > > >>>>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:01:08 +0200, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL > > >>>>> PROTECTED]> > > >>>>> said: > > > > SS> and there is clearly no wildcard in there :-) > > > > My bad. It was scheme_powersave, not disk. in > > /usr/lib/powersave/scripts/help_functions.load_scheme was told to load > > the backup version (scheme_powersave.20060702). > > Yes, schemes are actually a different beast. They are determined by the > scheme_ prefix, and what you see in the frontend is probably the name > from "SCHEME_NAME". Of course, 2 schemes with the same SCHEME_NAME should > at least give a loud warning in syslog, accompanied by the corresponding > filenames, and that in your case exactly the wrong scheme was picked, is > a bad coincidence... > > I'll think about a solution (which might just be a README.scheme-names in > /etc/powersave ;-), for now just name your backup > scheme_powersave.20060702~ since all files ending in '~' are ignored > anyway. Hi,
i commited a patch upstream, so in the future you'll get at least a warning in your syslog about this. It'll point you to the schemefile that redefines an already parsed scheme. Additionally to the *~ files, it will now also skip files ending with rpmsave and .rpmnew (for obvious reasons). Have fun, :) Frank
pgpcRXfkT3MTw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ powersave-devel mailing list [email protected] http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
