On Sunday 19 November 2006 17:39, Holger Macht wrote: > Just a note: Actually I find it unfortunate that kpowersave doesn't use > liblazy because we always would have to do fixes twice. But I understand > your concern that you don't want an additional dependency.
I can understand that you want people/projects to use liblazy, but as you already point this would make KPowersave depend not only on D-Bus and HAL. And on the other side I don't see the advantage for KPowersave because we need in KPowersave stuff like e.g. map to QT data types and so we can also use D-Bus and HAL also directly ... but this doesn't mean liblazy is useless ;-) Danny
pgphIGiXgGf0i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ powersave-devel mailing list [email protected] http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
