Agreed - very minor. I'll submit
Kurt On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com> wrote: > It's a minor documentation bobble. > > > > > > You can submit an issue or a patch at > > > > https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/windows-powershell-docs/blob/master/ > docset/windows/dfsr/remove-dfsreplicationgroup.md > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 1:11 AM > To: powershell@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: [powershell] Fwd: Mistake in documentation? > > > > All, > > > > I'm getting ready to dump and recreate a bunch of DFSR Replication Groups, > and see something a bit odd in the example for > > Remove-DfsReplicationGroup: > > > > Example 2: Remove replication groups using a wildcard > > > > PS C:\> Remove-DfsReplicationGroup -GroupName "RG*" > > -RemoveReplicatedFolders -Domain corp.contoso.com -RemoveReplicatedFolders > > Performing this operation will remove the replication group "RG01" > > and the subscriptions members have to this > > replication group. Are you sure you want to continue to remove this > replication group? [Y] Yes [N] No [S] Suspend [?] Help (default is "Y"): > > > > Performing this operation will remove the replication group "RG02" > > and the subscriptions members have to this > > replication group. Are you sure you want to continue to remove this > replication group? [Y] Yes [N] No [S] Suspend [?] Help (default is "Y"): > > > > Performing this operation will remove the replication group "RG03" > > and the subscriptions members have to this > > replication group. Are you sure you want to continue to remove this > replication group? [Y] Yes [N] No [S] Suspend [?] Help (default is "Y"): > > > > > > This command removes all replication groups that include the pattern > RG* in domain corp.contoso.com, even if the groups include replicated > folders. > > > > Notice the parameter -RemoveReplicatedFolders being used twice? Is this > correct, or redundant? > > > > Since we have a single forest/single domain environment, it's probably > nothing to me, but I thought it odd. > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > >
