i vote for version number
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sam Russell <[email protected]>wrote: > I like version numbers - if POX were ever to be productised, it would need > minor patches, so it'd always need some provision for minor version > numbers. Ubuntu has cool names, but each one corresponds to a version number > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Murphy McCauley < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Currently, POX has a version number (which has been at 0.0.0 since the >> beginning of time). >> >> I think the time is coming when we should either increment it, or we >> should kill it and just go by branch name. I am leaning towards the latter >> since obviously there is no meaningful version numbering going on anyway. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- Murphy > > >
