<seems my earlier message was too large with images> I had to try couple of times to replicate the issue. It is OFP-OFP-ARP and both packet-outs are carrying arp replies. I will recheck my program.
Cheers! Durga On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com>wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:04 PM, durga <c.vijaya.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello All, > > reserved port OFPP_FLOOD floods on all ports of the switch, is there any > such port to which a controller can flood on all connections made to > itself??? > > currently I tried sending ports on each connection using the > dpid:connection map as below > > > for aconnection in self.connections.values(): > if event.connection != > aconnection:#to avoid sending the pkt on incoming port > aconnection.send(msg) > > I am trying to implement proxy ARP(thanks to thread started by Muhammad) > and am trying to make the controller flood the arpreq on all its > connections incase of no entry , rather than instructing the switch to > flood. > > as of now I can see that controller is responding to both h3 and h1 with > arp responses, but the table itself is built by sw1 flooding the initial > arp req > > <Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 1.55.01 pm.png> > > > For starters, is 190 really screwy? Is it actually a packet-out > containing a packet-out which contains an ARP? Because that doesn't sound > right! > > -- Murphy >
