Thanks Murphy, one of my students working with POX wants to give a try and hopefullly contribute to these efforts, can you share the pointers to that POX branch. We can only say positive things about prototypiing with POX -- giving it clean and effective OF1.3 support would be a neat upgrade beneficial to all parties :)
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com > wrote: > Congratulations. > > There's now POX branch that's been quickly hacked up to (sort of) use > libfluid's Python bindings. It also includes a minor patch for one of the > swig .i files. > > -- Murphy > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Christian Esteve Rothenberg < > chest...@dca.fee.unicamp.br> wrote: > > Dear OpenFlow fellows, > > in case you are not aware about the public release of the winner > implementation of the OpenFlow driver competition (https://www. > opennetworking.org/competition) here is the pointer to the githubrepository: > > http://opennetworkingfoundation.github.io/libfluid/ > > libluid may be interesting to developers of both OpenFlow switches and > controllers. It features support of OpenFlow 1.0 and 1.3, high > performance, bindings to Python and Java, easy port to different hardware > architectures, etc. > > We welcome users and developers interested in building an open community > to maintain libfluid as a useful, multi-purpose OpenFlow library to > develop switch agents and controller implementations. > > -Christian (on behalf of the libfluid team) > _______________________________________________ > openflow-discuss mailing list > openflow-disc...@lists.stanford.edu > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss > > -- > Christian <https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss> > >
