Done like a charm
I have separated the actions into two tables
Thanks
Eng Amer Alghadhban
COE
SANS-GCFW
CEH, SCNP, CCNA
From: amer7...@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 01:17:46 +0300
To: murphy.mccau...@gmail.com
CC: pox-dev@lists.noxrepo.org
Subject: Re: [pox-dev] ports in pox
I tried it but it did not work, I tried local, normal and flood :(Nothing
work.My scenario is as the following:The packet arrived to the host-switch with
NATed srcIP address. I mean a modified source IP, however, the host-switch has
a rule to modify this modified sourceIP to the real source IP and send it to
the local port.The action looks like: action:mod_nw_src=192.168.2.1, local.
I do not know where is the problem in this scenario.
Best regards,Amer
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 4, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
Looking at page 6 and 19 of the OpenFlow spec, you can see that it's done via
the "local" port. On POX, this means creating an output action to the
OFPP_LOCAL virtual port.
-- Murphy
On Jun 3, 2015, at 3:32 AM, AMER <amer7...@hotmail.com> wrote:Hello,
Dear All
I would like to build a switch to switch communication, however, I am facing
some problem in output port action
how can I forward a received packet to the local network stack.
Best regards,
Eng Amer Alghadhban
COE
SANS-GCFW
CEH, SCNP, CCNA
