Well, IIRC, riplpox stuffs topology-specific addresses into the VLAN header. It's possible that at larger sizes, there aren't enough bits (or that they're not allocated correctly).
-- Murphy On Sep 2, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Amer <amer7...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Murphy > Yes, it is working correctly with the default number of host (i.e., 16 hosts). > > Best regards, > Amer > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 3, 2015, at 4:00 AM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Did it work correctly with a smaller number of hosts before modification? >> >> On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, Amer <amer7...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Dear All >> >> The default number of hosts in riplpox is 16. I modified some commands in >> dctopo.py in ripl folder to get the needed number of hosts. Accordingly, the >> riplpox recognize this increase and inserts the required flow-entries when I >> run it in proactive mode. Unfortunately, the added hosts can't ping each >> other. For example, hosts 0_0_2 can't ping the added host 0_0_4, at the same >> time, host 0_0_2 can ping 0_0_3. >> The flow-entries of all the hosts are installed in the flow-table, when I >> checked the flow-table of the switches. Also, I tried with reactive and the >> same problem was faced. >> >> Any body has a suggestion to solve this issue. >> >> Best regards, >> Amer
