On 28/04/16 5:09 PM, Flavius Aspra wrote:
Literate programs. I'm thinking of the book about LCC, where I never
Do you have any real-life example where complex stuff do not look like
I'd start with this.
Unfortunately, while literate programs help a lot, they do so by throwing
a *lot* of text at the problem, and still don't make relationships other
"mentions" really explicit. The major problem with literate programming
is that it's not happening. At *best* people are writing stuff like
and while that isn't too bad at describing interfaces that are just piles of
procedures, it's useless for someone trying to maintain a Java class,
because it encourages you not to write about hidden methods and there's
no way to describe the relationships between the methods, so people are
in effect being trained NOT to write the stuff I need to read.
I'm hoping that comparatively lightweight annotations that could be
exploited by an IDE (at least in principle) are something programmers
might be willing to use. Even me!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PPIG
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.