Coalition comrades will pay in blood for this barbaric idiocy
By Andy McNab
(Filed: 02/05/2004)

I was shocked when I saw the appalling pictures of the American soldiers humiliating 
and torturing Iraqi prisoners - but I wasn't surprised. The uncomfortable reality is 
that many soldiers could do what those men and women did. In Bosnia, the Canadians 
were alleged to have roasted prisoners over fires. The French in Algeria tortured 
their victims horribly. And yesterday there were fresh allegations that British 
soldiers had tortured an Iraqi prisoner, urinating on him and leaving him for dead 
after they chucked him out of a moving vehicle. The Army is saying that six corporals 
are likely to face charges related to the incident. But then what should we expect? 
Soldiers are trained to kill. They are required to be violent and aggressive. In a 
war, you see your friends die. Your emotions - anger, fear, desire for revenge - 
become almost overpowering. The majority are able to handle this but, sadly, a few are 
taken over the edge.

In a properly run army, however, an effective chain of command is precisely what 
prevents soldiers' baser instincts from running riot. That is the whole point of 
military discipline: to ensure that soldiers who are placed in situations that 
generate extreme emotions never let those emotions take them over. Army orders and 
procedures exist not just to help soldiers to kill the enemy ruthlessly and 
effectively, but also to prevent them from giving in to the urge to abuse and 
humiliate capitives.

The pictures shown on television in the US and published in the newspapers here 
demonstrate a lamentable failure of discipline and leadership within at least one unit 
of the US Army. If the latest allegations against the British soldiers also prove to 
be true, they will indicate that there are parts of the British Army which suffer from 
the same failing. Every commander knows this sort of thing can happen if he does not 
keep his troops under very tight control. That individual soldiers have been allowed 
to behave in so disgraceful a fashion in Iraq shows that some officers have lost 
control of their own troops. There must be swift, and very severe, punishment for that 
failure. And it should not just be the lowly ranks pictured participating in the 
torture who are punished. There must be more than a mild reprimand for the senior 
officers who are supposed to ensure that nothing of this kind ever takes place.

But the coalition forces have yet to demonstrate that they are capable of swiftly 
disciplining their own troops when they abuse prisoners. Nearly nine months after the 
first allegations against eight British soldiers emerged, the British Army has still 
not made up its mind whether to charge the men with any offence. An investigation was 
originally triggered when Private Gary Bartlam took photographs to a high street store 
for developing. The film turned out to show British soldiers forcing Iraqi prisoners 
to simulate sex with each other, and showed one suspended by a rope from a truck. The 
staff in the shop handed the prints to the Army authorities - who have yet to charge 
anyone.

Still, even severe punishment publicly meted out to those responsible would not be 
able to undo the damage done by the pictures of the US soldiers abusing Iraqis. The 
horribly grinning US soldiers have undermined everything the coalition claimed it 
invaded Iraq in order to achieve. The Americans said they were going into Iraq to end 
a regime of torture and terror. And yet here they are, operating one themselves, right 
in Abu Ghraib prison, the centre of Saddam's republic of fear.

It sickens me to see it. I have been in Abu Ghraib prison: I was taken there when I 
was captured fighting behind enemy lines during the first Gulf war. The place was 
truly terrifying, a monument to the animal brutality of Saddam's tyranny.

I was whipped by my "interrogators". They beat me with planks of wood. I wasn't 
electrocuted, it is true - but that was only because there was no electricity. 
Improvising novel methods of cruelty, the Iraqis would heat spoons on the paraffin 
heaters in the interrogation rooms and use them to burn my legs. I had my back teeth 
pulled out. I was stripped and forced to eat my own excrement. The humiliation was 
part of the torture.

Of course what the Americans did to their Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib was not as bad 
as that. But the photographs of the Americans taunting and insulting their Iraqi 
prisoners, stripping them naked and forcing them to undergo mock-executions and to 
simulate sex with each other, will have convinced thousands of Iraqis that the 
Americans are just as bad as Saddam's torturers. If there were any Iraqis who believed 
the coalition's claim that they were benign liberators, there won't be many now.

The soldiers responsible for the abuse have guaranteed thousands of new recruits to 
the organisations such as al-Qaeda which want to kill as many coalition troops in Iraq 
as possible. The images of torture they have created will have stiffened the resolve 
of the Iraqi militants and encouraged those Iraqis who were wavering to join the 
resistance against the coalition. So more young American soldiers will be blown apart 
by booby-trapped cars and shot by snipers. Their unnecessary deaths will have been 
caused by the stupidity of their own comrades.

There have been claims that the US interrogations resulted in valuable information. I 
doubt this. Whatever was going on when those pictures were taken, it was not the 
interrogation of prisoners by the US Army. It was some stupid kids bullying their 
captives for the sheer hell of it. You can tell that by the smiles on the faces of US 
soldiers - and indeed by the fact that there are any pictures at all of what happened. 
Those soldiers are anyway too young to be trained interrogators. Moreover, the woman 
wears a watch, which no serious interrogator ever does, because denying your victim 
any sense of time is an essential part of any properly-conducted interrogation.

No, this was just a group of fools determined to have fun by humiliating their 
prisoners. That they were allowed to do it is an indictment of the discipline and 
leadership in their unit. I hope someone sorts the mess out soon - otherwise something 
similarly horrible will happen again. And the Americans will lose Iraq permanently, 
with dreadful consequences for the rest of us.

Information appearing on telegraph.co.uk is the copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 
and must not be reproduced in any medium without licence. For the full copyright 
statement see Copyright 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/BRUplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih 
Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.arsip.da.ru
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke