Sdr. Suraiya,




Tulisan anda sangat berbobot, ter-lebih2 lagi dengan adanya catatan sumber berita. 
Patut dicontoh oleh penulis2 oped, terutama tulisan2 yang dimuat di media yang dibaca 
oleh masyarakat luas.



Isu yang sdri kemukakan, adalah sangat penting bagi kaum wanita, dimanapun mereka 
berada di dunia ini.



Pemerintah Kanada yang sekuler, sedang mempertimbangkan permintaan dari sebagian 
kelompok penduduk Kanada yang muslim untuk memberlakukan SI bagi orang Kanada yang 
muslim.



Kalangan wanita muslim di Canada yg selama ini berada dibawah naungan undang2 sekuler 
Canada, merasa terancam. Berikut adalah artikel yang ditulis oleh presiden dari pada 
perkumpulan The Canadian Council of Muslim Women .





http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1086041408679&call_pageid=968256290204&col=968350116795



The Star.com



Jun. 1, 2004. 01:00 AM 

 

 

The laws of the land must protect all of us, irrespective of gender or religion, by 
Alia Hogben 





The Canadian Council of Muslim Women is in a difficult position, as we speak out 
against our own government and some of our fellow Muslims, regarding the proposed 
application of Sharia/Muslim family law in Canada.



As citizens of Canada, we believe that the laws of the land must protect us, treat us 
equally and be applied to all of us, irrespective of our ethnicity, race, gender or 
religion. 



We know that any benefits for women in Muslim family law also exist in Canadian family 
law, plus greater protection of other rights. For example, the ability to have a 
pre-nuptial agreement, no polygamy, laws against violence, and fairer child custody 
than in Muslim law. 



The provincial Arbitration Act allows for the development of "sharia" tribunals 
outside the court system. 



We want family matters to be dealt with under the Family Law Act and not the 
Arbitration Act.



Neither the government nor the proponents are being honest about the Arbitration Act. 



It defines arbitration as a "private" matter without the safeguards of public 
scrutiny. 



There are no principles underlying this act, no training requirements for arbitrators, 
no standards, no limits to their process, no legal representation is needed, no 
records need be kept and only the award goes to the court. 



It has been repeated ad nauseam that the tribunals will adhere to the Charter, but we 
find no overseeing nor monitoring to ensure this. The woman would have to take a 
second legal step if she wants to challenge the binding arbitrated settlement. 



Where's the protection of rights, where's the cost efficiency and where's the justice?



We fear that this discussion may increase anti-Muslim hostility, which, sadly, would 
be injurious for us as individuals and as a community. However, the issue is too 
important because it is about women's human rights and our treatment under the laws of 
Canada.



The confusing use of terminology (sharia, Islamic, Muslim) is hampering this 
discussion.



Sharia is an encompassing, value-laden term, and literally means the beaten path to 
the water, and metaphorically describes the way Muslims are to live. 



It is far more profound than mere jurisprudence, (fiqh)or Muslim law.



The term "Islamic" connotes the teachings of the faith, while "Muslim" relates to 
matters of the believers. Muslim family law is the human interpretation, over 
centuries, of Islamic guidance and is not divinely ordained, as some would have us 
believe.



The proponents of these tribunals are deliberately using the term Sharia, knowing that 
this will silence discussion and give them "Islamic" legitimacy in the eyes of some 
believers. They play into the fears of us, newer Canadians, arguing that we need 
identity markers to remain Muslim. They are belittling the rights provided under 
Canadian laws and presenting an idealized version of Muslim law.



Based on research in different countries on the current application of Muslim family 
law, founded on a patriarchal model, the conclusion is that women's rights are 
adversely affected.



The Canadian Council of Muslim Women cannot be against sharia by definition; our 
concern is about the application of Muslim family law.



Unquestionably, 1,400 years ago Muslim women were given significant rights. However, 
it is misleading to think that these rights are adequate and that we should not have 
enhanced human rights under the Universal Declaration and the Canadian Charter of 
Rights and Freedoms, which we believe are congruent with the principles of Islam. 



We appreciate that in our homelands many faced economic woes, authoritarian 
governments, lack of democracy and human rights, plus some western neo-colonialism. In 
reaction, some yearn for a recreation of the halcyon, glorious days of Muslim 
civilization and for an idealized legal system.



If Muslim countries want to apply Muslim law, we would support development of a legal 
system based on Islamic principles of compassion, social justice and equality of all 
individuals, coupled with a strong commitment to democratic values of citizenship. 
Many of their current laws are not in keeping with these principles.



In Canada, we can live fully as Muslims because of the values of fairness, social 
justice and acceptance of diversity. We should work with our fellow citizens when 
faced with injustices rather than segregating ourselves in fragmented communities. 



However, on this issue, we, Muslim women, are being dealt with in a discriminatory and 
unjust manner by both our own government and by the proponents of sharia tribunals.



We appeal to our fellow Canadians to help us fight an act that not only fails to 
protect us but gives permission for us to be treated adversely. 





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alia Hogben is president of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women.

















 --- On Fri 08/13, raiyabilly < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

From: raiyabilly [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:42:32 -0000

Subject: [ppiindia] Re: Penilaian ttg Penerapan Syariah di Aceh



_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih 
Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi.4t.com
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke