http://wsws.org/articles/2003/nov2003/ji3-n14.shtml

The political origins and outlook of Jemaah Islamiyah
Part 3
By Peter Symonds
14 November 2003
Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

Below we are publishing the concluding section of a three-part series 
on Jemaah Islamiyah. Part 1 was posted on November 12 and Part 2 on 
November 13.

In South East Asia, the network created by the Afghan War drew 
Islamic 
extremist groups closer together-a process that appears to have been 
facilitated by the presence of Al Qaeda figures in the Philippines. 
Sometime in 1993, Sungkar and Bashir founded Jemaah Islamiyah. As a 
result 
of their lengthy exile, they had already established many contacts in 
Malaysia and Singapore. JI members had, for example, forged ties with 
the 
MILF (Moro Islamic Liberation Front) in the Philippines-using its 
bases 
for military training instead of the increasingly difficult 
alternative 
in Afghanistan.

Inside Indonesia, Suharto was making a conscious effort to enlist the 
support of various Islamist groups as a prop for his increasingly 
fragile regime. In the early 1990s he made an ostentatious pilgrimage 
to 
Mecca and established the Indonesian Association of Islamic 
Intellectuals 
(ICMI), under the leadership of his close ally B.J. Habibie. The ICMI 
was permitted to publish its own daily newspaper Republika. Other 
concessions included proportionate representation for Muslims in the 
state 
bureaucracy and the military, the setting up of an Islamic bank and 
legislation to enhance the status of Islamic courts.

Suharto's tactical manoeuvres quickly bore fruit. Hardline DDII 
leaders 
fell in behind him, becoming prominent in the formation of KISMI, the 
Indonesian Committee for Solidarity with the World of Islam. KISMI 
had 
close links to Suharto-through his son-in-law, General Prabowo 
Subianto-and became a platform for championing "Islamic causes" such 
as the 
oppression of Muslims in Bosnia, Kashmir, Chechnya and Algeria. While 
Bashir and Sungkar remained in exile, continuing to oppose Suharto, 
the new 
climate was certainly conducive to JI's politics.

The crucial turning point in JI's evolution came in 1997-98 with the 
Asian financial crisis-an economic meltdown that served to exacerbate 
social and political tensions throughout the region. In Indonesia, 
the 
value of the rupiah plummetted, businesses were bankrupted and the 
debt-laden financial system was brought to the brink of collapse. 
Levels of 
poverty and unemployment rose sharply. The US and the IMF further 
compounded the economic and social turmoil by insisting that Suharto 
implement 
far-reaching restructuring measures.

Suharto's position rapidly became untenable. Unwilling to comply with 
IMF demands that threatened his monopoly of economic and political 
power, the Indonesian president lost the unconditional backing of 
Washington. At the same time, he confronted mounting protests, 
spearheaded by 
students, who were demanding an end to his 32-year dictatorship, 
along 
with measures to arrest falling living standards. Suharto was finally 
compelled to step down in May 1998 and hand over power to his loyal 
ally 
Vice President Habibie.

Significantly, Sungkar, Bashir and JI played no role in the downfall 
of 
Suharto. Inside Indonesia, KISMI and other rightwing Islamist groups 
backed the president to the bitter end. After Suharto was ousted, 
they 
threw their support behind Habibie. When, in November 1998, Habibie 
faced 
a fresh crisis as he sought to use a special parliamentary session to 
consolidate his grip on power, KISMI helped organise his defence. It 
provided most of the 100,000 "volunteers"-thugs armed with batons and 
knives- who, along with army troops, intimidated and attacked huge 
protests 
demanding Habibie's resignation and genuine democratic elections.

But the most critical role in propping up Habibie's regime was played 
by the bourgeois "reformers"-Megawati Sukarnoputri, Abdurrahman Wahid 
and Amien Rais. At the height of the demonstrations all three agreed 
to 
Habibie's limited measures, effectively giving the green light for 
the 
violent suppression of the demonstrations.

As the protest movement waned, the military deliberately fomented 
communal conflict as a means of reasserting its authority. In 1999, 
the TNI 
top brass was intimately connected with the wave of terror unleashed 
by 
pro-Jakarta militia against pro-independence supporters in East 
Timor. 
The army was also deeply involved in the promotion of sectarian 
violence in the Malukus and Sulewesi in 2000.

In the absence of any progressive alternative aimed at unifying all 
sections of the Indonesian working class and oppressed masses around 
the 
struggle for genuine social equality, JI and other Islamic extremist 
groups were able to exploit these communal tensions. Sections of the 
middle class and small business, suddenly bankrupted by the financial 
crisis, were ready to believe propaganda blaming their new 
predicament on the 
corrupting influence of Christians and ethnic Chinese. Young people 
with technical or university education and rosy future prospects saw 
their 
careers collapse before their eyes. They rapidly became disenchanted 
with the hollow rhetoric of the "reformers" and disaffected with the 
state of society as a whole. Some, out of despair and desperation, 
turned 
to Islamist groups and militia such as JI.

Moreover, JI's anti-American propaganda found a wider audience. Many 
Indonesians were angry at Washington's IMF agenda, with its 
devastating 
social consequences. In the ensuing five years, that hostility has 
been 
further compounded by the Australian-led intervention in East Timor, 
the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and continuing US support 
for 
Israel's repression against the Palestinians. All of this has been 
seized 
upon by JI as "proof" of an anti-Islamic conspiracy.


Terrorist attacks

Bashir, Sungkar and other JI members returned to Indonesia in 1999 
and 
began expanding their small network of Islamic schools. After 
Sungkar's 
death, Bashir assumed the role of ideological leader. He established 
the Mujaheddin Council of Indonesia (MMI) that included other 
individuals 
and groups intent on establishing an Islamic state. In August 2000, 
MMI 
held its first congress in Yogyakarta, which was attended by some 
1,500 
people, including figures such as the chairman of the Justice Party, 
Hidayat Nur Muhammad. Bashir, who was elected supreme leader, boasted 
that the body had connections with major Muslim organisations.

The main emphasis at the congress was on moral strictures: the 
banning 
of alcohol and the imposition of restrictions on women. But the MMI 
also recruited its own militia units and dispatched them, with the 
tacit 
approval of the military, to take part in communal fighting in the 
Malukus, which claimed an estimated 5,000 lives. In turn, the Malukus 
conflict provided JI with new members who had military training and 
experience, as well as being ideologically committed.

Terrorist bombings began in Indonesia in 1999-2000 and JI has been 
specifically linked to two. On Christmas Eve 2000, a coordinated 
series of 
bomb blasts took place across the country. More than 30 bombs were 
set 
to explode at the same time at Christian churches or the homes of 
clergy in 11 cities in six different provinces. Nineteen people were 
killed 
and around 120 were injured. Two years later, the Bali atrocity 
occurred.

Several of the perpetrators were Afghan veterans who had been 
recruited 
via the Bashir-Sungkar network. The ICG report Jemaah Islamiyah in 
South East Asia: Damaged but still Dangerous provides a long list of 
the 
names of trainees and their dates of training at Sayyaf's camps in 
Afghanistan. The list includes key figures in the 2000 church 
bombings and 
the Bali attack. Three of the four men so far convicted in the Bali 
bombings, for example, served in Afghanistan: Muchlas alias Ali 
Gufron 
[1986], Ali Imron [1990] and Abdul Aziz alias Imam Samudra [1991].

But the full story of these terrorist attacks is yet to be told. The 
most obvious questions-about the role of the Indonesian military-
remain 
unanswered. It is simply not plausible that Indonesia's vast security 
and intelligence apparatus knew nothing about the large logistical 
operation involved in the Bali bombings. Yet no investigation has 
been 
carried out into precisely what information military officials had 
prior to 
the attack. Any leads casting suspicion on the TNI-including the 
detention of a military officer-have been quickly dropped.

The TNI has a long and sordid history of political thuggery. It also 
has decades of experience in penetrating and manipulating militia 
groups 
and gangs, including Islamic extremist organisations. Earlier this 
year, six special forces soldiers, including an officer, were 
convicted 
over the political assassination of a prominent Papuan leader. 
Moreover, 
sections of the military have several motives for staging a 
spectacular 
terrorist attack, or allowing one to take place, including creating a 
justification for greater US military aid and cooperation, which is 
currently subject to a US Congressional ban.

Bashir's involvement in the Bali attack remains unclear. ICG reports 
indicate evidence of divisions in JI between Bashir, who appears 
intent 
on using the MMI to gain influence with the established parties, and 
the 
younger Afghan veterans, who are keen to use their military skills. 
It 
is significant that while Bashir has been tried-and acquitted-in 
relation to the Christmas 2000 bombings, he has never been charged 
over Bali.

Whether or not he personally planned or authorised the Bali bombings, 
Bashir bears responsibility for the political perspective that led to 
the senseless death of 202 innocent people. Any organisation whose 
members hail such a tragedy as a "victory" has nothing to do with the 
interests of the working class. JI's vision of a society run by 
clerics 
enforcing a mediaeval moral code is irreconcilably opposed to the 
democratic 
rights and aspirations of the masses of ordinary working people.

The very emergence of JI, and its ability to make an appeal to 
significant sections of the Indonesian population, constitutes the 
most 
malignant expression of the incapacity of the entire Indonesian 
ruling elite 
to offer any solution to the deepening political, social and economic 
crisis confronting the vast majority of the population. A genuine 
solution to this crisis, however, lies not in the rise to power of 
another 
section of the bourgeoisie, committed to medievalism and Islamic 
fundamentalism, but the socialist reorganisation of society-on the 
basis of 
genuine social equality, justice and democracy for all, not just the 
privileged few. This requires building a new political movement of 
the 
working class that will fight to unite all layers of workers and the 
oppressed masses-in Indonesia, throughout Asia and internationally-in 
a common 
struggle against the current economic and social order.

Concluded

See Also:
One year after the Bali bombing
The Australian government and the "war on terrorism"
[11 October 2003]
What is bin Ladenism? Al Qaeda leader's letter to Americans
[29 November 2002]


------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih 
Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppiindia.shyper.com
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke