http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/EL06Df05.html
6 Decc. 2003

ISLAM AND HINDUISM

Part 1: Spiritual symbiosis
By Sultan Shahin

TIRUPATI, South India - It is impossible to spend several days visiting 
ancient temples in and around Tirupati, one of the four "Meccas" for Hindus, 
as the only Muslim in the company of about 50 Hindu journalists, having a 
darshan (close encounter) of Balaji, as Lord Venkateshwar is popularly 
called, detect not the slightest hint of unease on the part of any of my 
Hindu colleagues on account of my being a Muslim, get a rare opportunity to 
spend a couple of hours meditating in a temple room next to where Balaji is 
installed, and not reflect on the growing hostility between Islam and 
Hinduism that is threatening to keep India from realizing its destiny in the 
21st century.

Does the fault lie with the two faiths or with their practitioners? Are the 
two faiths irreconcilable in their belief-systems? Do they have any points 
of convergence? Is it right to say that Islam is monotheistic and Hindu 
polytheistic and so the twain can never meet? Can Hinduism be simply 
dismissed as a polytheistic faith, with idol worship as its chief form of 
worship, as the Muslim fundamentalists tend to do?

If the two faiths are so irreconcilable, how can thousands of Hindus visit 
and pay obeisance at Muslim shrines in all parts of the country every day 
and a Muslim visit and have darshan of Hindu deities without provoking the 
slightest discomfort? How can Hindu mahants (priests) invite Muslims for 
Iftar (ritual breaking of fast during the month of Ramadan) in the temple 
town of Ayodhya, which has now become a by-word for Hindu-Muslim hostility 
since the medieval Babri mosque was demolished there in 1992? And how can 
the Muslims then reciprocate by inviting Hindus in the same hotbed of 
hostility to share the ritual festivities of Eid?

Hinduism and Islam have lived in India together for almost 14 centuries. The 
first 13 as excellent neighbors. "Love thy neighbor, for he is yourself." 
said the Vedas. The Koran agreed: "Do good - to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, 
those in need, neighbors who are near, neighbors who are strangers, the 
companion by your side, the wayfarer." (An-Nisa 4.36).

But the 20th century changed all that. As a result of the British colonial 
divide-and-rule policy, coupled with the short-sightedness of Hindu and 
Muslim politicians, the country witnessed growing disaffection, culminating 
in partition at the time of independence from colonial rule in 1947, and 
periodic outbursts of unimaginable savagery on the part of both communities.

This disastrous trend is continuing, infecting hitherto unaffected sections 
in rural areas and the south of India, apart from the previously affected 
east, west and north of India. We may lose the 21st century, too, to the 
forces of disintegration and chaos unless we rediscover the spiritual 
symbiosis that kept the two communities in near-perfect harmony for such a 
long time.

Hinduism is known for the catholicity of spirit, broadmindedness and a 
holistic approach, but many Muslims merely dismiss it now as a byword for 
superstition. Part of the blame lies with the rise of obscurantist 
fundamentalists and their exclusivist approach in recent years, though Islam 
was spread in India largely by Sufi saints who considered all religions to 
be merely different paths to God.

But also responsible for the present image of Hinduism is Christian 
missionary propaganda under British colonial supervision and support that 
has affected not only Muslims and Christians, but also Westernized Hindus 
educated through missionary schools. Hinduism has been accused, for 
instance, of permitting "the most grotesque forms of idolatry, and the most 
degrading varieties of superstition".

It seems to me, however, that a symbiotic spiritual relationship exists 
between the two great religions. It is a realization of this spiritual 
symbiosis, though largely unconscious, that I believe helped sustain this 
harmonious relationship despite the invading Central Asian hordes led by 
Ghaznis and Ghoris, who called themselves Muslim, and the British 
colonialists with their massive effort at divide and rule using all possible 
propaganda tools.

Islam's encounter with other religions was quite violent. The history of 
Crusades launched by Christian powers is well known. It was Hinduism alone 
that provided Islam with a fertile ground for growth, something it had 
denied for long centuries even to indigenous Buddhism. Muslims' treatment of 
Hindus, too, was quite considerate and in keeping with the Islamic spirit of 
Lakum Deenakum Waleya Deen (For you your religion, for me mine, the 
Koran -109:5). As Hindus had the reputation of being polytheists and 
idolaters, Muslims could have treated them as Kauffar and Mushrekeen 
(religious deviants). Instead, the very first Muslim to conquer parts of 
India - Sind and Multan in 711 AD - Mohammad bin Qasim, accorded them the 
special status of Ahl-e-Kitab (people who follow divine books brought by 
messengers of God before the Prophet Mohammed) that was at first thought to 
be meant for Christians and Jews alone. (Muslims are permitted to have the 
best of social, including marital relations, with the Ahl-e-Kitab). Even the 
Central Asian bandits who invaded and looted India could not disturb the 
growing and deepening spiritual ties. A number of Sufi saints spent their 
lifetime in India, spreading the message of Islam, that literally means 
peace, that comes with total surrender to God. The Prophet Mohammed, too, is 
believed to have felt an attraction for India.

The Indian sub-continent's pre-eminent poet-philosopher Allama Iqbal wrote:
Meer-e-Arab ko aaee thandi hawa jahan se,
Mera watan wohi hai, mera watan wohi hai.
(From where the Prophet Mohammed received a cool breeze,
That is my motherland, that is my motherland.)

Hindus as Ahl-e-Kitab
Some primordial spiritual connection must have been at work. For only 
recently have Muslim scholars learnt that Hindus indeed constitute the 
fourth major group of Ahl-e-Kitab mentioned in the Holy Koran repeatedly. 
For some mysterious reason, the Holy Koran had left this question vague. It 
mentioned a major religious group as "Sabe-een" as the ummah (community) of 
a prophet who had brought a divine book bearing God's revelation to the 
world. It also mentioned Hazrat Nooh (Prophet Noah of the Bible) as a major 
prophet ranking with prophets like Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Mohammed. But 
who the followers of Hazrat Nooh are was left a mystery.

Painstaking research has been going on seeking the fourth major Ahl-e-Kitab. 
>From Hazrat Shah Waliullah, Maulana Sulaiman Nadvi and Maulana Obaidullah 
Sindhi to a contemporary scholar from Uttar Pradesh, Maulana Shams Navaid 
Usmani, a number of scholars from the sub-continent, too, contributed to 
this effort. It is now clear that Hindus are indeed the lost ummah of the 
Prophet Nooh, whom they know as Maha Nuwo. Evidence from Markandaya Puran 
and several Vedas, and their description of "Jal Pralaya" (devastation 
caused by the Flood, as in the biblical and Koranic stories of Noah's flood) 
has been most helpful in this search.

The authenticity and finality of the above-mentioned research has not to be 
accepted by any one, however, to be able to know that the Hindus do indeed 
constitute a major Ahl-e-Kitab ummah (religious community). According to the 
Holy Koran, there is not one nation in the world in which a prophet has not 
been raised up: "There are not a people but a prophet has gone among them" 
(35:24). And again: "Every nation has had a prophet" (10:47). And again: 
"And we did not send before thee any but men to whom we sent revelation 
[Divine Book]" (21:7).

We are further told that there have been prophets besides those mentioned in 
the Holy Koran: "And we sent prophets we have mentioned to thee before [in 
the Koran], and prophets we have not mentioned to thee [in the Koran]" 
(4:164).

It is, in fact stated in a famous Hadees (also written as Hadith, meaning 
sayings of the Prophet, as distinct from the Holy Koran, which is believed 
by Muslims to be the word of God revealed to the Prophet) that there have 
been 124,000 prophets, while the Holy Koran contains only about 25 names, 
among them being several non-Biblical prophets. Prophets Hud and Salih came 
in Arabia, Luqman in Ethiopia, a contemporary of Moses (generally known as 
Khidzr) in Sudan, and Dhu-i-Qarnain (Darius I, who was also a king) in 
Persia; all of which is quite in accordance with the theory of universality 
of prophethood, as enunciated above. And as the Holy Koran has plainly said 
the prophets have appeared in all nations and that it has not named all of 
them, which in fact was unnecessary and not even feasible. Thus a Muslim 
must accept the great luminaries who are recognized by other religions as 
having brought light to them, regardless of the terminology used to describe 
them, as the prophets that were sent to those nations.

The Koran, however, not only establishes a theory that prophets have 
appeared in all nations; it goes further and renders it necessary that a 
Muslim should believe in all those prophets. In the very beginning we are 
told that a Muslim must "believe in that which has been revealed to Abraham 
and Ishmael and Issac and Jacob and the tribes, and in that which was given 
to Moses and Jesus, and in that which was given to the prophets from their 
Lord, we do not make distinction between any of them" (2:136). The word 
"prophets" in this verse from the Koran clearly refers to the prophets of 
other nations.

Again and again, and in different contexts, the Holy Koran speaks of Muslims 
as believing in all the prophets of God and not in the Holy Prophet Mohammad 
alone: "Righteousness is this that one should believe in Allah and the last 
day and the angels and the books and the prophets" (2:177). And again in the 
same surah (chapter): "The Prophet believes in what has been revealed to him 
from His Lord and so do the believers; they all believe in Allah and His 
angels and His books and His prophets: And they say 'We make no distinction 
between any of His prophets' " (2:28).

Part 2: Are Hindus Kafir?

(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for information on our sales and syndication policies.) 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih 
Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppiindia.shyper.com
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke