Europe pays the price for cultural na�vet� 
 By William Pfaff Thursday, November 25, 2004

PARIS In the realm of European immigration, the damage done by the political 
correctness of the past is only now beginning to be felt. 
.
In several countries, notably in Scandinavia, a policy of unquestioning 
tolerance of cultural differences was adopted because to demand assimilation 
was thought to imply a "racist" claim to superiority, with the inevitable 
comparisons with Nazi Germany. 
.
In Germany itself, where nationality was long considered ethnic in origin, 
immigrants originally were excluded from cultural or political assimilation, 
with the fiction that they were all "guests" who would eventually go home. 
Instead, their families followed them to Germany, and they now demand 
citizenship. 
.
France believed in immigration in principle, but pretended to itself that its 
Muslim North African immigrants would eventually go away. Now, of course, this 
substantial minority poses a great problem, which the French are belatedly 
trying to deal with through efforts to integrate the younger generations. 
.
The troubled case of the Netherlands is the most interesting, however, because 
the Dutch - like the British - said their aim was a multicultural society 
composed of equals. This was a convenient illusion, or form of hypocrisy, 
because the Netherlands, like other West European countries, never ceased to 
believe in the superiority of its own society and to indulge in a high-minded 
denial of the power of national cultures and religion. 
.
The Dutch gave immigrants the benefit of their generous welfare system. They 
took for granted the social discrimination and economic disadvantages that 
immigrants suffered. Their notion that the Netherlands would eventually become 
a peaceful multicultural society, in which its large immigrant population would 
melt away, becoming successful, if exotic, Dutchmen and women, was well 
intended but unrealistic. 
.
As everyone could see, the Netherlands remained a tight and parochial 
post-Calvinist society. It was not a likely candidate for multiculturalism. 
Still, no one imagined that this would lead to an explosion of hatred and 
violence, even though the conformity that the Netherlands expected was 
profoundly subversive of Muslim religion and culture. 
.
A crucial part of the Muslim immigrant population rejected the terms of Dutch 
multiculturalism. It would not even learn to speak Dutch. And a crucial part of 
Dutch society expressed its own anger at this rejection when Pim Fortuyn, a gay 
rights activist, made himself into a sensationally successful parliamentary 
candidate in 1998 by saying that the Netherlands was "full" and wanted no more 
immigrants. (He was subsequently murdered, but not by a Muslim.) 
.
This year, after Dutch television screened Theo Van Gogh's tendentious attack 
on the Muslim treatment of women - including images that some Muslims found 
blasphemous - the filmmaker was murdered, apparently by a young Muslim 
committed to Islamic fundamentalism. Revenge attacks on Muslims and their 
schools and mosques followed. 
.
This specifically Dutch tragedy was created by good intentions combined with 
false assumptions about the human, social and political realities of cultural 
difference. After the Nazi catastrophe, racial and cultural distinctions were 
interpreted as cause for discrimination and conflict, and accordingly were not 
only avoided but denied. Certain illusions about the nature of man were - and 
are - promoted. People in the West want to continue to believe in these 
illusions, despite all that history has done to disprove them. 
.
They include the belief that the core values of the Western democracies are 
innate, and that education, the liberalization of political and social 
institutions, and political action can liberate these values among people who 
don't yet recognize them. It is believed that everyone is headed not only 
toward liberal democracy but also toward secularism or religious indifference. 
.
Western political (and even economic) values are said to be universal, valid 
for all societies now and in the future. Hence the unity of mankind is only a 
matter of time. The moral complexity of the human condition in the past is 
ignored, or is simply unknown. 
.
It all adds up to a na�ve version of the belief in inevitable human progress 
that arose during the French Enlightenment and has inspired virtually every 
Western political ideology we have known since - and that history has 
repeatedly disproved. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi-india.uni.cc
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke