http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/FL03Ae02.html

ASEAN, China all smiles for now
By Alan Boyd 

SYDNEY - China has firmly laid to rest any lingering doubts over its long-term 
intentions in East Asia by ratifying an accord that will create the world's 
biggest free-trade area - and sow further unease in Washington. 

The deal with the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), 
signed on Monday at a summit in the Laotian capital, Vientiane, aims to give 2 
billion people access to duty-free goods by the end of the decade. With India 
agreeing to open negotiations on a similar deal, the expanded trade zone will 
envelop about half the world's population. And there are plans to bring in 
Japan and South Korea, with Australia and New Zealand also waiting in the wings 
for invitations. 

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao spoke expansively during the summit of a "strategic 
choice made in the interests of China's own development and in the common 
interests of the region". 

These interests, clearly defined by the shadow of China's burgeoning economic 
might, set a sharp new image of Asia's future direction that will be guided as 
much by the urge to conform to Chinese aspirations as the collective hopes of 
East Asians. 

Overnight, the region has secured a degree of unification capable of matching 
the bargaining might of the European Union and the North American Free Trade 
Area (NAFTA). Equally important, it has shifted the weight of strategic 
influence away from Washington, perhaps permanently. 

There will continue to be doubts over how united East Asia can be with its 
patchwork of political discord, territorial conflict and economic inequality. 
Initially, at least, only the six more-advanced ASEAN states - Singapore, 
Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei - will gain any 
appreciable benefit from enhanced access to Chinese markets. 

As finer details of the accord are sketched in, nationalism and domestic 
political interests are also likely to intrude. It is difficult to imagine 
Thailand allowing total access to its rice market or Malaysia opening up to 
cheaper Chinese automobiles. 

At this point, the accord amounts to an outline agreement to remove selective 
tariffs on manufactured goods and farm produce by 2010 and create a "plan of 
action" for closer cooperation in services such as transportation, information 
technology and tourism. Negotiations on the trade in goods were completed in 
September, and tariff cuts will begin in 2005. An early-harvest program has 
already been implemented to eliminate or reduce most import duties on 
vegetables and fruits. 

Hard talking has yet to start concerning the more prickly areas of services and 
investment, such as protected aviation routes, employment limits on 
professionals, and financial services, which will be hampered by deep 
disparities in development levels. But look beyond the blurred print, and the 
numbers speak for themselves: two-way trade between ASEAN and China was 
multiplying by 20% a year even before the two parties agreed last year on the 
first phase of tariffs liberalization. 

Since January, market growth has increased by 35.6% year-on-year, even with a 
slowdown in Southeast Asian private consumption demand and an austerity program 
in China's overheated manufacturing and services industries. While the combined 
market is expected to turn over US$1.2 trillion this year, ASEAN is still only 
China's fifth-largest trading partner - a ranking unchanged for 11 consecutive 
years - offering enormous scope for expansion as sectoral integration 
accelerates. 

The region's combined gross domestic product (GDP) is a modest $2 trillion, 
with Singapore the only member of the bloc that has attained developed-nation 
status. With five other ASEAN other states regarded as newly industrialized 
nations and three - Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia - as largely undeveloped, China 
will be the unchallenged regional economic leader. 

So far the ASEAN states appear to be comfortable with this position, publicly 
at least. One reason is that their own commercial sectors now have a 
significant but largely hidden stake in China's economic emergence. As of June, 
the ASEAN countries had cumulative investments totaling $34 billion in China, 
second only to the countless billions of dollars, much of it hidden, that has 
been channeled in by overseas Chinese businesses in Hong Kong and Taiwan since 
the late 1970s. 

China is also becoming more active in ASEAN, with an investment of $1.037 
billion in June, according to official figures released in Beijing. Most of 
this commitment has been by state enterprises involved in the strategic 
farming, mining and construction sectors. 

All that remains is for Beijing's ascendancy to be cemented at a diplomatic 
level, as it moves to fill the vacuum left by Washington's troop withdrawals 
and preoccupation with counter-terrorism, as well as an Asian backlash over the 
mishandling of the Iraqi and Afghan military interventions. 

This will come when ASEAN hosts a special East Asian summit next year alongside 
its regular gathering, which will include the leaders of erstwhile economic 
rivals South Korea, Japan and India as well as the 10 ASEAN member states. The 
outcome is likely to be a formal East Asian Community modeled on the European 
Union. 

In agreeing to Wen's demand for a summit independent of ASEAN, the bloc has, in 
essence, accepted that the center of gravity has shifted to the north. ASEAN 
may still have a role as a buffer among the conflicting interests of China, 
India and Japan, but as a bloc, is well on the way to becoming an economic 
subjugate of Beijing. 

Southeast Asians may find their interests compromised in other ways if the 
free-trade agreement (FTA) framework realizes a mooted strategic evolution 
toward a consensus - if largely unexplained - framework for closer cooperation 
in "politics, security, and military affairs". 

Even if the defense sharing is largely limited to disputes consultation and 
weapons exchanges, as is generally expected, the agreement will still represent 
a generational shift from Beijing's 1990s security phobias, when 
multilateralism was viewed with deep suspicion. 

China reacted coolly when former Malaysian prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad 
first proposed an East Asian Economic Community in the early 1990s; the plan 
eventually was dropped under intense pressure from Washington. But when the 
idea was revived two years ago, the momentum came not from ASEAN but from 
China, and this time the US entreaties have been muted. Beijing, probably 
convinced that an economic showdown was inevitable with the US, made a shrewd 
preemptive strike while Washington was preoccupied with the Persian Gulf 
quagmire. 

China's position had been undergoing subtle changes since the 1990s, when it 
unexpectedly began to heed ASEAN's demands for a collective solution to a 
territorial standoff threatening vital trade routes in the South China Sea. 
Beijing later signed a pact setting aside sovereignty over that region, which 
will pave the way for the joint commercial exploitation of oil and gas tracts - 
though China will again be the main beneficiary as it happens to have the 
largest number of territorial claims. 

A wider non-aggression accord known as the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation was 
initialed at the Laos summit, and - intriguingly - China has backed a 
regionwide prohibition on the use of nuclear weapons, a pact that Washington 
has consistently refused to endorse. 

Economic discussions also have security overtones. Money is being poured into 
telecommunications, energy and transport schemes that will foster a sense of 
mutual dependency. There have been high-level meetings on a currency-swapping 
arrangement and a pan-Asian bonds fund to finance development projects. 

Washington faces some deep soul-searching over its growing impotency in Asia. 
Although it retains strong bilateral security relationships, especially with 
Japan and South Korea, the US could be shut out of a broader dialogue as the 
geopolitics goes regional. There are already signs that the traditional US 
leadership, in disputes resolution, is being superseded by a more confident and 
adroit Chinese posture. 

Diplomats acknowledge that China holds most of the cards in negotiations over 
North Korea's nuclear arsenal, the democratization of Myanmar, realignment of 
the former communist Central Asian states and even - indirectly - prospects for 
reconciliation between India and Pakistan. 

In the global arena, China has procured the allegiances of a formidable array 
of non-aligned Third World states that have the numbers to smother US 
objectives. They already have had Washington ejected from the key international 
human-rights forum. 

Japan's reaction to the FTA, now eagerly awaited, will have a crucial bearing 
on whether Asia proceeds to the next step of integration, as few analysts 
harbor any doubts that a China-Japan axis, once unthinkable, would be able to 
put the squeeze on the United States. 

Both countries have sizable current-account and trade surpluses with the US, 
and the Japanese in particular have significant levels of portfolio and direct 
investment in US markets. The central banks of Japan and China have the world's 
largest foreign-exchange reserves, and much of this is invested in the Treasury 
bills that the US Federal Reserve uses to underwrite budget deficits and 
stabilize the dollar. Combined holdings of government debt by the two countries 
are believed to amount to at least $1.2 trillion, offering an unparalleled 
ability to influence internal policies, if they wish. 

But for now, China is happy to play a subtle waiting game, content in the 
knowledge that the ASEAN states are searching for a mentor closer to home and 
just can't get enough of the Chinese relationship. 

"There is only one way out, not by looking West but by looking inward," 
Philippine President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said in Laos. "A large East Asia 
bloc can secure ASEAN, China, Japan and Korea as economic leaders in the 
Asia-Pacific. We must ensure that China, Japan and Korea find it more 
convenient to be in our bloc than not." 

Alan Boyd, now based in Sydney, has reported from Asia for more than two 
decades. 

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us 
for information on sales, syndication and republishing.) 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi-india.uni.cc
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke