http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/GE27Aa03.html
May 27, 2005 


More arms for US's 'friends'
By Thalif Deen 

NEW YORK - The United States has accelerated arms sales to some of the world's 
most repressive and undemocratic regimes since September 11, 2001, according to 
a new report from leading arms trade researchers. 


The report, from the Arms Trade Resource Center at New York-based New School 
University's World Policy Institute, says the increase in sales and military 
grants is a payoff to countries that have either joined what the White House 
calls its "war on terror" or have backed the United States in its military 
occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. 


A majority of US arms sales to the developing world also go to regimes "defined 
as undemocratic by our own State Department" or Foreign Ministry, says the 
study. According to the report, US-supplied arms are involved in a majority of 
the world's active conflicts, including those in Angola, Chad, Ethiopia, 
Colombia, Pakistan, Israel and the Philippines. 


The study cites the recent decision by the administration of President George W 
Bush to provide new F-16 fighter planes to Pakistan, while pledging comparable 
high-tech military hardware to India - thereby providing US arms to both sides 
in a long-brewing conflict among two nuclear-armed rivals. 


Moreover, the tens of millions of dollars in US arms transfers to Uzbekistan - 
where many anti-government demonstrators were killed recently - "exemplify the 
negative consequences of arming repressive regimes", it says. 


According to the study, countries defined as "undemocratic" in the State 
Department's annual human-rights report are also major recipients of US 
military aid or weapons systems. These include: Saudi Arabia (US$1.1 billion in 
2003), Egypt ($1 billion), Kuwait ($153 million), the United Arab Emirates 
($110 million), and Uzbekistan ($33 million). 


"Arming repressive regimes while simultaneously proclaiming a campaign against 
tyranny undermines the credibility of the United States and makes it harder to 
hold other nations to high standards of conduct on human rights and other key 
issues," said Frida Berrigan, co-author of the study, "US Weapons at War 2005: 
Promoting Freedom or Fueling Conflict?" 


The largest US military aid program - labeled Foreign Military Financing (FMF) 
- increased by as much as 68% from 2001 to 2003, rising from $3.5 billion to 
nearly $6 billion. Under FMF, recipient nations get outright US grants on 
condition these funds are used only for the purchase of US weapons systems, 
thereby ploughing the money back into the multi-billion-dollar US defense 
industry. 


The only two countries that are exceptions to the rule are Israel and Egypt, 
close US allies who are permitted to use FMF funds to buy weapons from their 
domestic armaments industries, according to the US Defense Department. 


The biggest FMF increases went to countries engaged as US allies in the wars in 
Iraq and Afghanistan. These included Jordan (a $525 million increase from 2001 
to 2003), Afghanistan ($191 million increase), Pakistan ($224 million 
increase), and Bahrain ($90 million increase). All of the increases, both in 
arms sales and FMF, were in the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the 
United States. 


Two dozen nations, including Afghanistan, Algeria, Pakistan, Uzbekistan and 
Uruguay, either became first-time recipients of FMF during this period or were 
restored to the program after long absences. As a result, the number of 
countries receiving FMF assistance increased from 48 to 71 between 2001 and 
2005 - a 47.9% increase. 


Natalie J Goldring, executive director of the security studies program at the 
School of Foreign Service at Washington-based Georgetown University, said the 
Bush administration had failed to demonstrate any link between open-ended 
weapons transfers and success in fighting terrorists. 


"This report indicates that the opposite may well be the case. By lifting 
controls over weapons transfers, we are more likely to increase the risks of 
these weapons falling into our adversaries' hands," Goldring told Inter Press 
Service. 


She said US law prohibits weapons transfers to countries that systematically 
abuse the rights of their citizens. Enforcing these laws would produce dramatic 
improvements in the US's arms transfer policy - but the Bush administration has 
failed to do so, Goldring added. 


Berrigan of the World Policy Institute said that no single policy is more at 
odds with Bush's pledge to "end tyranny in our world" than the US role as the 
world's leading arms exporting nation. "Although arms sales are often justified 
on the basis of their purported benefits - from securing access to overseas 
military facilities to rewarding coalition partners - these alleged benefits 
come at a high price," she said. 


According to the study, in times of crisis, such as the tsunami that killed 
more than 300,000 people, the US public has been very generous. 


"And they assume their government is as well. While the United States doles out 
billions of dollars in foreign aid every year, Washington tends to favor 
military aid and weapons sales over other forms of aid, de-prioritizing 
humanitarian, health and development aid, even though these types of foreign 
aid have long-term constructive impact," the study says. 


The Bush administration's arms trade policies mirror the those of 30 years ago, 
when then-secretary of state Henry Kissinger traveled the world, "treating arms 
transfers as if they were party favors," Goldring said. "These policies are 
short-sighted and may well create the very threats they are intended to 
combat." 


Weapons manufacturers, meanwhile, are profiting from an upsurge in contracts to 
produce US-supplied weapons, Goldring said. "But these transfers place current 
and future US military personnel at risk of attacks from American weapons that 
have fallen into the wrong hands. Once transferred, we have little control over 
these weapons." 

(Inter Press Service)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Dying to be thin?
Anorexia. Narrated by Julianne Moore .
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FLQ_sC/gsnJAA/E2hLAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppi-india.org
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke