http://www.thejakartapost.com/detaileditorial.asp?fileid=20051010.F04&irec=3


Why should Papua aspire to full independence? 
Pradana Boy ZTF, Malang

The factors that have caused Papuans' desire to be free from Indonesia cannot 
easily be determined. Papua's desire is rooted in many different factors 
ranging from the issues of race, culture and socio-political rights to economic 
reasons. It can also be argued that, by and large, there are two opposing views 
regarding Papua's demand to be independent: Keeping its status as a provincial 
state of Indonesia on the one hand, and freedom from Indonesia as an 
independent state on the other hand.

Discovering the origins of Papua's aspiration to gain independence will lead us 
to the long history of Dutch occupation in the region, Indonesia's attempt to 
integrate this region into its territory and also Papua's struggle to defend 
its identity as Melanesian in the midst of a modernization wave and of outsider 
political influence. 

Basically, the problem of Papua has been caused by the Indonesian government. 
The Indonesian government tends to hide the real history of Papuans. John 
Rumbiak, a Papuan scholar suggests that Papua's independence is not an easy 
thing to decide whether for Indonesia or Papua. He identifies the Indonesian 
government in Papua as meaning nothing but a new form of colonialism. 

It is ironic that, given their richness in natural resources, Papuans are left 
impoverished. Colonial powers that are mainly foreigners (sometimes foreigners 
also refers to Indonesians from a Papuan viewpoint) exploit Papuan resources 
without involving indigenous Papuans in doing so. They have been benefiting 
from the exploitation of Papua's rich natural resources with no concern for the 
Papuans themselves. 

This policy is also accompanied by what Rumbiak calls a racist policy. He 
states: "When Jakarta transmigrates 'expert' agriculturalists from Java it is 
also being racist, because Papuans already know how to use the land." 

Furthermore, Rumbiak proposes that possible ways to solve all problems 
occurring in Papua are dialog and non-violent approaches. Violence and a 
militaristic approach would only worsen the situation and decrease the trust of 
Papuans in the Indonesian government. 

The most forceful factors that have caused Papuans to desire to be free from 
Indonesia are the militaristic "approaches" that have killed thousands of 
Papuans. Through dialog, it would be clear what Papuans require from Indonesia 
and what the Indonesian government should do about Papua. 

They propose three fundamental questions: 

First, Papuans want to know about their history. 

Second, they want Jakarta to handle and address systematic violations of their 
civil and socio-economic rights. 

Third, they want to speak up about their identity crisis as a Melanesian group 
within Indonesia. 

However, the Papuans should be aware of the necessary preparations to achieve 
independence and of what would need to be done once independence was achieved. 
The absence of this awareness would only lead Papua into further trouble. 

The difficulty of integrating Papua into Indonesia is related to identity. They 
do not identify themselves as Indonesians, but as Papuans. 

Many Papuans believe that they belong to a sovereign modern nation state, which 
was established on Dec. 1, 1961 through the raising of the flag. 

When Habibie took over power from Soeharto, a group of Papuan leaders demanded 
that Habibie grant what had been granted to East Timor: autonomy or 
independence. When Abdurrahman Wahid came to power, he seemed to be more 
accommodative of Papua. The first thing he did was to change the name of the 
region from Irian Jaya to its original name of Papua. 

Unfortunately, his government's generosity was wrongly perceived as the 
readiness of Jakarta to give independence to Papua. 

In conclusion, the problems that accompany the issue of West Papuan 
independence must be carefully weighed. On the one hand, the Indonesian 
government should be honest about West Papuan history and truthful in relating 
the process of Papua's integration into Indonesia. On the other hand, from 
Papua's side, it should be realized that creating an independent modern state 
is not simple. 

The writer is a lecturer at the Muhammadiyah University of Malang, currently 
studying at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Help Sudanese refugees rebuild their lives through GlobalGiving.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/V8WM1C/EbOLAA/E2hLAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. http://www.ppi-india.org
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Kirim email ke