http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060131/news_1n31exxon.html
Exxon posts record $36 billion profit

Company downplays results in face of growing scrutiny

By Simon Romero and Edmund L. Andrews
NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

January 31, 2006 

HOUSTON – Exxon Mobil, aided by strong energy prices,
said yesterday that it had $36 billion in annual
income last year, a record for profits among U.S.
companies. But while most companies would be proud to
trumpet record profits, Exxon Mobil did everything it
could to play down the news. 

Graphic:


Exxon Mobil's
annual net income 
For Exxon, which also handily widened its lead over
Wal-Mart as the company with the most revenue in the
nation, the report was an embarrassment of riches.
Anxious about criticism of the results, executives
began laying the groundwork months ago to try to
prevent a political reaction against the company and
the energy industry. 

For example, Exxon bought advertisements in leading
newspapers arguing that profit margins in the industry
lagged far behind those of other industries, like
pharmaceuticals and banks. 

Still, growing oil profits are generating new scrutiny
of the industry, with legislators and taxpayer groups
expressing concern over Big Oil's good fortune, as
soaring energy prices put increasing pressure on
consumers. 

“If it's Google, no one asks about the profits because
they're too busy buying the stock,” said Amy Myers
Jaffe, associate director of the energy program at
Rice University. “Exxon is different. We have these
emotional feelings related to gasoline because there's
no readily available substitute.” 

Exxon's results yesterday caused jaws to drop; by some
measures, the company became richer than some of the
pivotal oil-producing nations. Exxon reported a 27
percent surge in profits for the fourth quarter as
elevated fuel prices gave rise to full-year profits in
2005 of $36.13 billion on revenue of $371 billion.
Exxon said its overall profits climbed more than 40
percent last year, while its tax bill rose only 14
percent. 

“It's outrageous for Big Oil to be making these kinds
of profits,” said Rep. Eliot Engel. Engel, D-N.Y., has
sponsored legislation with a leading House Republican,
Jack Kingston of Georgia, to provide new incentives
for alternative fuels and energy conversion
technologies. 

“We don't need any more tax breaks for the industry,
any more sops to the industry that's making record
profits,” Engel said. 


 
 Advertisement 
 
 
 
Gasoline prices at the pump are rising again, with the
average price of regular unleaded gasoline up nearly 7
percent from a month ago, to $2.34 a gallon, according
to AAA, the automobile club. 
In one measure of Exxon's wealth and influence, its
revenue of $371 billion surpassed the $245 billion
gross domestic product of Indonesia, an OPEC member
and the world's fourth most populous country, with 242
million people. 

The company's huge profit report came as no surprise
to the White House or to lawmakers in either party,
but it arrived just as Congress was preparing to
resume a fight over imposing a one-time windfall
profits tax on the major oil companies. 

Last fall, the Republican-controlled Senate passed a
bill to extend about $60 billion in tax cuts over the
next five years, but it included a provision that
would impose a one-year tax increase of $5 billion on
the nation's largest oil companies. The measure is
unlikely to survive. President Bush has threatened to
veto the tax bill if it includes the tax on oil
companies, and House Republicans included no
comparable measure in their own tax bill. 

Another measure approved in the Senate would
effectively remove the foreign tax credit that the
nation's three largest oil companies, Exxon, Chevron
and ConocoPhillips, receive for taxes paid in other
countries. Most energy analysts do not see the
measures winning approval in the House, but Exxon
executives remain concerned. 

“We take these issues very seriously,” said Mark
Boudreaux, a company spokesman. “We realized that we
needed to do a better job of explaining how the
industry works.” 

To make its case, the company organized slide shows
for groups of journalists ahead of the report,
explaining that its operations accounted for only 3
percent of global oil production. 

Republican lawmakers were on the defensive yesterday.
Not only are they under pressure from party leaders
and from the White House to kill the proposed tax on
oil companies, but they also inserted more than $2
billion of additional tax breaks for oil and gas
companies in the energy bill that Congress passed in
November. 

A spokesman for House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill.,
said the oil companies had to explain themselves
better and offer more information on their plans to
lower fuel prices by expanding their refining capacity
in the United States. 

“The message from the speaker is that oil companies
need to do more work to bring oil and gas prices
down,” said Ron Bonjean, a spokesman for Hastert, who
is to meet today with the president of the American
Petroleum Institute. “Companies make profits, and
that's OK. But when you're dealing with a family's
bottom line, we'd like to see some kind of plan to
address rising costs.” 

Executives at Exxon, which is based in Irving, Texas,
have tried in recent weeks to reposition the public
discussion of the company's profits by comparing
results with those of other industries. For instance,
said Boudreaux, the Exxon spokesman, pharmaceutical
companies earned 18.6 cents for each dollar of sales
in the third quarter of 2005, and banks 18 cents,
compared with 8.2 cents at oil and natural gas
companies. 

Still, the company's profits stand out by almost every
measure. Exxon's profit last year of $36.1 billion
easily surpassed the earlier mark of $25.3 billion,
which Exxon had set in 2004, according to Howard
Silverblatt, senior index analyst at Standard & Poor's
in New York. Only Ford Motor Co.'s profit of $22
billion in 1998 comes close to Exxon's success in
recent memory, Silverblatt said. 

Exxon's profits climbed last year thanks largely to
higher prices for oil and natural gas, but also for
other reasons, including higher margins at its
refineries, the start of oil production at a project
on Sakhalin Island in Russia's Far East, and a gain
from the sale of a stake in Sinopec, an energy concern
controlled by China's government. 

Exxon shares surged to $63.11, up $1.82, or 2.97
percent. However, even as investors applauded Exxon's
new chief executive, Rex Tillerson, who succeeded Lee
Raymond at the start of this year, Exxon's results
masked potentially weaker profits if oil and gas
prices begin to decline. 

Production on an oil-equivalent basis at Exxon's oil
fields around the world declined 1 percent in 2005,
excluding stoppages at platforms in the Gulf of Mexico
from last year's hurricanes. This illustrates an
industrywide problem: an inability to tap into the
world's richest oil exploration areas in the Middle
East and Venezuela because of political barriers. 

“Lack of access to new reserves is the most important
problem Exxon and the other large oil companies are
facing,” said Michael Economides, a professor of
chemical engineering at the University of Houston. “It
should make them paranoid about the future.” 


===
Ingin belajar Islam sesuai Al Qur'an dan Hadits?
Kirim email ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.media-islam.or.id

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.  Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke