http://www.rense.com/general73/imppe.htm

Impeachment Or
World War III?
By Ted Lang
Exclusive to Rense.com

8-15-6
Hezbollah has gained immensely in strength and resolve
as a result of the 
current unprovoked and unjustified carnage planned and
executed by Israel 
against a peaceful Lebanon. These horrific war crimes
perpetrated by Bush 
USA and Israel, two of the axis-of-evil nations, were
supplemented by the 
distraction provided by the third AOE nation in
manufacturing yet another 
phony false-flag terrorist plot. I didn't even bother
to familiarize myself 
with the long array of descriptive details, which as
of yet haven't even 
been invented. I trust nothing either my government or
the governments of 
the other two criminal nations have to say through
their harlots in the 
"American" MSM.

I am an American, but I hate my government for not
only doing nothing to 
stop the totally unnecessary slaughter of innocent and
unarmed men, women, 
children, the aged and the infirmed in Lebanon, but
for encouraging, aiding 
and abetting the holocaust as well in supplying
additional precision 
weaponry to carry out the mass murders. Bush may be
heavily guarded and 
feel secure in his bunkers in Crawford and Washington,
but he's got an 
unavoidable rendezvous with some serious reckoning.
And the sooner this 
serious reckoning takes place, the better for all
Mankind. Bush must be 
impeached immediately. If this doesn't happen, we will
assuredly be 
irreversibly enmeshed in Bush, Israel and Great
Britain's plot to ignite 
World War III and to launch the New World Order global
government.

To facilitate impeachment, and to bring the Bush crime
and war machine to a 
halt, the American political environment must now be
inundated with the 
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
"Politics-as-usual" or 
PAU will be the prescription to bring about the most
horrendous conditions 
in America since those early dark days of the American
Revolution, when the 
impending crushing force of the world's most powerful
nation, Great Britain, 
was about to be unleashed on the people of the
American colonies.

American fools who think a political solution is
available for removing 
these criminals from control over the horrific power
of the American 
military have all but succumbed to the distraction
that is America's 
so-called two-party system. It is for this reason that
I consider Rush 
Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and all of
FOXNews as traitors. This 
crisis is not about liberal versus conservative, or
even about conservative 
versus neoconservative; it turns on the survival of
our nation which is now 
totally under the control of lunatics.

Let US first examine the charges and the response from
the MSM apologists, 
sycophants and enablers of the Bush war and crime
machine. All the articles 
already written, as well as those recently penned by
Dr. Henry Makow and 
Henry Picciotto on Rense.com and that of Bill
Christison on Alex Jones' 
PrisonPlanet.com ["Former CIA Analyst: Stop Belittling
the Theories About 
September 11"] expose in depth serious and glaring
flaws in the Bush 
regime's explanations of the vulnerabilities and
circumstances of 9/11. The 
explanations are astonishing in terms of their
effrontery to even 
individuals of average intellect. And given the
challenges that even people 
of average intelligence can pose to the explanations
offered by Bush and his 
Kean 9/11 Commission, why do the MSM stooges take such
umbrage with any 
modicum of inquiry demanding a clearer line of
reasoning?
Of course, we know the answer. The charges are
codified as being so 
horrific, so outlandish, and so ridiculous that they
need to be summarily 
dismissed as only being politically based and
orchestrated. In other words, 
challenging the Bush regime's story is just "politics
as usual" as mentioned 
earlier. But instead of news junkies and the
information audience writing 
off accusations of wrong-doing, it is the American
mass news media that is 
doing this. Where is there any evidence of either
journalistic challenge or 
independence? Where is there loyalty to America, to
its founding, to its 
war veterans and our war dead that fought in all
America's wars? What about 
journalistic loyalty honoring our patriots, and the
slaughtered innocent 
workers and our fellow citizens at the WTC and the
Pentagon? Isn't there 
even one American journalist that cares for America?
Not even one? Perhaps 
Lou Dobbs and/or Brian Lamb?

It's BAU [business as usual] for journalists and PAU
for our elected 
politicians. Fortunately, former government employees
are increasingly 
coming forward, such as Christison, and this is
helpful. But whether or not 
Bush and his fellow criminals will be held
accountable, or even whether or 
not the GOP will be ejected from the halls of Congress
in the November 
midterm elections, neither is of any importance within
the context of the 
present dangerous international political environment
created by Bush, his 
GOP Congress, and the spineless wimps representing the
Democratic Party. 
The dead cannot be brought back. The dead in Iraq,
Afghanistan, Lebanon, 
the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and Flight 93
will never be amongst US 
again. Indeed, Bush and his criminals saw to that.

Rather, it is for US the living, to not only honor
their sacrificed lives, 
but to prevent the impending and horrific carnage and
destruction that will 
be initiated by World War III. World War III will not
be "over there"; it 
will be here and now! And if Americans are so stupid,
H. L. Mencken's 
"booboisie" if you will, such is no longer the case.
As Christison 
correctly points out, Americans are beginning to see
the crimes perpetrated 
by the criminal Bush regime in spite of the
smokescreens and propaganda 
hogwash continuously and senselessly articulated by
Limbaugh, Hannity, 
O'Reilly and Amanpour.

I disagree totally with Christison's conclusions that
relegate to secondary 
importance the simple question regarding military
drills on that day. 
Christison's "key" points require proof supported by
forensic inquiry, 
inquiry the Bush regime and its FBI went way out of
their way to block and 
prevent. And Christison highlights his key points by
launching them in an 
air of high probability: "ONE: An airliner almost
certainly did not hit The 
Pentagon." Then, "TWO: The North and South Towers of
the World Trade Center 
almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth
because hijacked 
aircraft hit them." I'm sorry, but to me, "almost
certainly" is a shaky 
foundation to make such "astounding and outlandish"
charges against our 
caring, compassionate and constitutional government.

All that is required of the Bush regime is a simple
answer as to whether or 
not there were drills being conducted that morning.
Considering the 
testimony of Bush's Transportation Secretary, Norman
Mineta, when speaking 
in front of the 9/11 Commission, the basis for that
simple inquiry is 
anchored in the recorded testimony attributed to this
high-level Bush 
administration appointee. All that is required from
this salient is a 
simple "yes" or "no" answer; even this we weren't able
to obtain from 
Bush-Kean.

Clearly, the most expeditious route to a real and
meaningful inquiry would 
be regarding "stand down" drills. It is these that
contributed most heavily 
accentuating our vulnerability and made all the other
events and conditions 
of 9/11 possible. This is not to quibble, but to
simply employ the most 
expeditious and most easily established fact. Someone
somewhere will fess 
up, and the dominoes will begin to fall. Any other
approach is shrouded by 
lengthy tests, testimony, legalistics, precedent, the
President's "right to 
privacy," "privileged information," "national
security," etc., etc., etc. 
And Christison's motivation in terms of trying to find
out and fix 
responsibility is equally flawed ­ by the time the
finger pointing is 
launched, dependent upon the aforementioned tedious
and lengthy processes 
and hurdles that must be overcome, Iran will be
engulfed in nuclear flames 
and mushroom clouds.

The lengthy and drawn-out process required to get at
the whole truth can, 
and should be, incorporated in the impeachment
process. But first things 
first: Bush and his neoconservative loony tunes must
be stopped before it is 
too late. Iran's President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is no
dummy ­ he is 
extremely educated and convincing. Not having seen his
interview on CBS' 
"60 Minutes," I can only guess he came across far more
intelligently than 
our moron in the White House. In all likelihood, Iran
not only has nuclear 
arms, but has the missiles and therefore the means to
deliver them. With 
his engineering background, Ahmadinejad knows that no
matter how advanced 
his WMDs are, unlike the 19 camel drivers that so
easily penetrated 
America's unmatched and failsafe defenses on September
11, 2001, another 
means of retaliation must be deployed.

It has been pointed out that Iran trades heavily with
North Korea providing 
them with ample supplies of crude oil. North Korea is
a starving nation, so 
what could they possibly offer Iran in return? The
implication is obvious, 
and Ahmadinejad's cockiness and confidence as
expressed in his admonitions 
to US and Israel leave me feeling very uneasy.
Consider the Bush insanity 
that has left our southern borders totally vulnerable
as he bumbles, fumbles 
and stumbles to move US towards the New World Order.
Does Iran already have 
an anti-American/counter terrorism strategy in place?
Should we find out? 
Should Israel?

Bush and Israel must be stopped, and they must be
stopped now before the 
mushroom clouds come home to roost. And the means are
now available to 
bring this rapidly about. Politics is NOT the means,
but it can be tried 
first as well. It requires grass roots pressure.
Members of Congress, ALL 
OF THEM, must be contacted immediately and told that
Bush's warmongering 
powers must immediately be suspended to avert the
neocons' plans to ignite 
World War III with Syria and Iran. That war will move
swiftly to our soil, 
since Russia and China will correctly surmise that
they will be next. That 
precludes putting Iran's strike capability in a neat
little box. We are 
already vulnerable thanks to Bush's non-border policy.
Americans must take 
advantage of those courageous MSM outlets that are
trying to save America 
from the Bush's regime's suicidal hallucinations. They
must be employed as 
fact-base sources to counter charges of whacko
conspiracy theories launched 
by the FOXNews conspiracy practitioners.

We can bring pressure on both the Congress and all the
governors in our 
states to demand Bush's impeachment, not in terms
political vendetta, but to 
avoid World War III. And C-Span and Scholars for 9/11
Truth will provide a 
believable base for argument. Bush and Israel's
planned nuclear attack on 
Iran, as well as the response from that nation and
possibly others, will not 
be the same WMD/regime change "cakewalk" that was
Iraq; things will be very 
different this time around. Consider the resolve the
ill-planned Lebanese 
Holocaust brought forth in Hezbollah, Hamas and ALL
the Arab and Muslim 
nations. Consider the reaction of the entire world
community! Can there be 
any doubt as to the expected level of response?

Former CIA official and National Intelligence Officer
Christison explains 
the grassroots potential: "A Scripps Howard News
Service/Ohio University 
poll taken from July 6 to 24, 2006 concluded that
'more than a third [36 
percent] of the American public suspects that federal
officials assisted in 
the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop
them, so that the 
United States could go to war in the Middle East.' The
poll also found that 
'16 percent of Americans speculate that secretly
planted explosives, not 
burning passenger jets, were the real reason the
massive twin towers of the 
World Trade Center collapsed.'

A poll done by the Zogby polling organization two
months earlier, between 
May 12 and 16, 2006, and using questions worded
somewhat differently, 
suggested even more strongly that the issue could
become a 'big one' if 
aggressively publicized. This poll concluded that 42
percent of Americans 
believed there had indeed been a cover-up of the true
events of 9/11, and an 
additional 10 percent of Americans were 'unsure.' The
co-author of the 
poll, W. David Kubiak, stated that, 'despite years of
relentless media 
promotion, whitewash, and 9/11 Commission propaganda,
the official 9/11 
story still can't even muster 50 percent popular
support.' Whichever of 
these polls is closer to the truth, it would seem that
there is considerable 
support for making a major political issue of the
subject."

Precisely! It is the "American" MSM that is not only
America's greatest 
enemy, but humanity's as well. If those who blindly
support the Bush regime 
and the GOP are so assured of the total absurdity,
ridiculousness, and 
outlandishness of the charges of an "inside job" on
9/11, why don't they 
initiate debate on their radio and TV shows to finally
settle and silence 
these "phony" conspiracy claims?

Can you believe that Christine Amanpour of CNN and
Rush Limbaugh are now 
reading from the same page to protect Bush? Remember
Limbaugh's former rage 
at CNN during those awful days of the Clinton regime?
And what about "Guy 
Smiley" O'Reilly? Writing in his organization's
general e-mail newsletter, 
Dr. Kevin Barrett, the organizational head of MUJCA
[Muslim-Jewish-Christian 
Alliance for 9-11 Truth] the organization that
sponsored the Dr. David Ray 
Griffin 9/11 University of Wisconsin speech carried on
C-Span, stated in his 
newsletter that O'Reilly virtually came out and
strongly suggested that 
Barrett be outed via physical violence. In a 
"Who-will-rid-me-of-this-meddlesome-priest"
non-invective directed at 
Barrett in a televised tirade on FOX, O'Reilly
"couched his remarks in the 
context of assailing other academicians who have
asserted that the 
government had a role in bringing about the events of
9/11, a claim to which 
he takes strong exception."

These quotes are taken from the website of Scholars
for 9/11 Truth and 
posted in their "Press Releases" section. The article
detailed O'Reilly's 
attack on both Barrett and his university: "He
attacked the leadership of 
the University of Wisconsin, which has reviewed the
case and will allow 
Barrett to teach a course this fall. During his
program on 11 July, 
O'Reilly remarked, 'This guy would have been gone at
Boston University, my 
alma mater, in a heartbeat. The Chancellor there, John
Silber, would 
of--would have--this guy'd be in the Charles River
floating down, you know, 
toward the harbor.' He implied that allowing Barrett
to teach at BU 
'wouldn't happen' but 'at the University of Wisconsin
there are no 
standards. . . . I'm stunned.'"

The article goes on: "What's stunning is that this
man, who knows nothing 
about the events of 9/11 apart from what the
government has told him, 
nevertheless assumes unto himself the role of judge,
jury, and (it even 
appears) executioner! This is a travesty, an
astonishing violation of 
academic freedom, freedom of speech, the right of the
people to be free from 
assault. Verbal threats are assaults, especially when,
as in this case, 
they endorse physical violence against a citizen.
Barrett, who was alerted 
to the threat by David von Kleist of The Power Hour,
has replied by writing 
to Rupert Murdoch, who owns Fox News, suggesting that
if he were killed as a 
result of these remarks, 'Fox News would find itself
facing the mother of 
all lawsuits, and my family might very well end up in
control of the Murdoch 
fortune.'"

I ask simply: Why wait?! Sue O'Reilly and FOXNews
right now, first by 
demanding an apology and then putting Murdock and his
Irish Setter junk yard 
dog on notice that if Barrett were to lose his job,
O'Reilly's vicious 
attacks documented in the public news domain defamed
him! And if any Bush 
supporter at either the University of Wisconsin or an
elected fascist in the 
state legislature tries to maneuver Barrett out of his
job, all involved 
will be sued.

And what about the families of the 9/11 victims? What
about Cindy Sheehan 
who lost her boy? Legal expert Jonathan Turley offered
during the impending 
Clinton impeachment that all that has to be shown to
impeach the president 
is to prove that the president lied to the people.
That's all ­ just prove 
he lied? We have mountains of evidence that Bush lied
and that virtually 
everyone in the Bush administration lied about 9/11.
No impeachment? Then 
let the lawsuits begin!

© THEODORE E. LANG 8/15/06 All rights reserved

Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke