wah bikin laper aja nih=P~ (nglirik jam...2jam lagi!!! yuhuyy) sering-sering comment dunx mas, dengan wawasan luasnya ms satrio pasti banyak membantu menjembatani 2 kubu ini, tapi kalo bisa yg bhs indonesia aja mas biar ngartiinnya ga ngos2an (hehehe ktauan yg minim)
Walopun telat aq mo ijin nih, berhubung artikel di blogg-nya panjang2 aq lebih suka nge-print buat bacaan di rumah tp tetep ada post by & tanggalnya koq, (kalo sewaktu2 ngutip hehehehe). Ga di kelompokin berdasarkan kategori aja ms biar nyarinya gampang ato archived by month, ato emang fasilitas itu ga ada di blogspot?? Maturnuwun untuk semua ilmu yg udah dibagiin gratis:) --- In [email protected], Satrio Arismunandar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Betul, Mbak... > Terimakasih atas apresiasinya.... > > Di bulan Ramadhan ini kita memang sebaiknya bicara > yang sejuk-sejuk saja. Maka saya nggak pernah atau > jarang sekali komentar, apapun tanggapan orang > terhadap tulisan saya. > > Saya juga heran, kenapa orang kok senang betul sama > yang panas-panas ya? > > Tapi kalau buka puasa pakai sop panas, soto panas, > atau bakso panas, nah itu saya suka.... he..he..he... > > Salam adem ayem, > Satrio > --- ndah maldiniwati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ini ms satrioarismunandar di blogspot.com?? saya > > suka banget baca > > blogg-nya njenengan terutama resensi2 bukunya & > > dunia jurnalisme. > > moga membawa AC-nya di milis yg sedang panas ini:) > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Satrio Arismunandar > > > > <satrioarismunandar@> wrote: > > > > > > Crisis Is Upon Us > > > by Paul Craig Roberts > > > > > > A number of experts have concluded that despite > > the > > > Bush administration' s desire to attack Iran, the > > > aggression would be too rash and the consequences > > too > > > dire even for the irrational Bush administration. > > > > > > Military experts point out that at a time when > > > generals are calling for more troops for > > Afghanistan > > > and Iraq, it would be ill-advised for Bush to add > > Iran > > > to the war theater. Experts note that Ira is well > > > armed with missiles capable of attacking US ships > > and > > > oil facilities throughout the Middle East and that > > > Iran can direct its Shiite allies in Iraq to > > assault > > > US troops there and set in motion terrorist > > actions > > > throughout the Middle East. > > > > > > Diplomatic experts point out that the US is > > isolated > > > in its desire for war with Iran and has no ally > > except > > > Israel, thus validating Muslim claims that the US > > is > > > Israel's instrument against Muslims in the Middle > > > East. Experts note that military aggression is a > > war > > > crime and that US violations of international law > > > isolate the US and destroy the soft power on which > > US > > > leadership has been based. An attack on Iran could > > be > > > the last straw for Muslims chaffing under the rule > > of > > > US puppet governments in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan > > and > > > Saudi Arabia. > > > > > > Economic experts point out that the impact on the > > > price of oil would be severe and the economic > > > consequences detrimental. With the US housing > > bubble > > > deflating, now is not the time for an oil shock. > > > > > > It is difficult to take exception to this expert > > > analysis. Nevertheless, the Bush administration > > > continues to send war signals. Credible news > > > organizations have reported that US naval attack > > > groups have been given "prepare to deploy orders" > > that > > > would put them on station off Iran by October 21. > > > > > > How can Bush administration war plans be reconi > > led > > > with expert opinion that the consequences would be > > too > > > dire for the US? > > > > > > Perhaps the answer is that what appears as > > > irrationality to experts is rationality to > > > neoconservatives. Neocons seek maximum chaos and > > > instability in the Middle East in order to justify > > > long-term US occupation of the region. Following > > this > > > line of thought, neocons would regard the loss of > > a US > > > aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf as a way to > > > solidify public support for the war. US public > > anger > > > at the Iranians could even result in US public > > support > > > for a military draft in order to win "the war on > > > terror." > > > > > > The Bush administration could bring Congress > > around by > > > announcing a "Gulf of Tonkin" incident or by > > > orchestrating a "terrorist attack." However, this > > is > > > unnecessary as Bush has prepared the ground for > > > bypassing Congress with his propagandistic > > allegations > > > that Iran, by arming Iraqi insurgents, sponsoring > > > terrorism, and building nuclear weapons, is the > > major > > > part of the ongoing "war against terrorism." Now > > that > > > Iran is blamed for rising violence in Iraq, an > > attack > > > on Iran follows as a matter of course. All Bush > > has to > > > do is to continue with his lies in order to bring > > the > > > American public to a new war hysteria. > > > > > > Bush's attorney general has demonstrated that he > > has > > > no qualms about validating any and all extra-legal > > > powers that the White House requires for violating > > the > > > US Constitution and international law. The > > > congressional attempts to block illegal > > wiretapping > > > and torture have failed. The Senate has refused to > > > authorize torture, but the Senate has not > > prevented > > > the administration from torturing detainees. The > > > compromise leaves it to the White House to decide > > by > > > executive order whether its interrogation > > practices > > > are objectionable. In an editorial (September 22, > > > 2006), the Washington Post concluded that "the > > abuse > > > can continue." > > > > > > Polls show that Bush administration propaganda has > > > convinced a majority of inattentive Americans that > > > Iran is making nuclear weapons. Polls show that a > > > majority support an attack on Iran under this > > > circumstance. The neoconservatives and their media > > > allies have succeeded in causing the public to > > confuse > > > Iran's legal nuclear energy program with a weapons > > > program. > > > > > > The International Atomic Energy Agency, whose > > > inspectors pour over Iran's nuclear energy program > > for > > > signs of a weapons program, recently denounced a > > House > > > Intelligence Committee report as "outrageous and > > > dishonest." Written by the Republican neocon > > staff, > > > the Republican report falsely alleges that Iran > > had > > > enriched uranium to weapons grade last April and > > that > > > the IAEA had removed a senior safeguards inspector > > to > > > keep the alleged breach of the Nuclear > > > Non-proliferation Pact secret. > > > > > > Once again neoconservatives have shown that they > > will > > > tell any and every lie to achieve their goal of > > > attacking Iran. Jingoistic anti-UN Bush supporters > > > will automatically believe the neocon lie and will > > > swallow right-wing talk radio claims that the UN > > is > > > protecting Iran's nuclear weapons program. As we > > > learned from the Iraq hysteria, facts and experts > > are > > > no impediment to the Bush administration' s lies. > > > > > > Rumsfeld's neocon Pentagon has rewritten US war > > > doctrine to permit preemptive nuclear attack on > > > non-nuclear countries. As the USpaid a huge public > > > relations cost in terms of world opinion and > > distrust > > > of the US by endorsing the first use of nuclear > > > weapons, the revision of US war doctrine must have > > a > > > purpose. > > > > > > Neocons claim that tactical nuclear weapons are > > > necessary to destroy Iran's underground > > facilities. > > > However, the real reason for using nukes against > > Iran > > > is to intimidate Iran from retaliating and to > > threaten > > > the entire Muslim world with genocide unless > > Muslims > > > bend to the neocons?will and accept US hegemony > > over > > > their part of the world. > > > > > > September 25, 2006 > > > Dr. Roberts [end him mail] is Chairman of the > > > Institute for Political Economy and Research > > Fellow at > > > the Independent Institute. He is a former > > associate > > > === message truncated === > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > *************************************************************************** Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia *************************************************************************** __________________________________________________________________________ Mohon Perhatian: 1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik) 2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari. 3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
