What Your Brain Looks Like on Faith
Friday, Dec. 14, 2007 By DAVID VAN BIEMA 
 
A scan of a brain.
Owen Franken / Corbis
Article Tools
Print
Email
Reprints
Sphere
AddThis
RSS
  
Sam Harris is best known for his barn-burning 2004 attack on religion, The End 
of Faith, which spent 33 weeks on the New York Times best-seller List. The 
book's sequel, Letter to a Christian Nation also came out in editions totalling 
hundreds of thousands. Last Monday, however, the combative Californian produced 
a shorter (seven pages) and seemingly calmer publication that will be a hit if 
it reaches 10,000 readers: "Functional Neuroimaging of Belief, Disbelief and 
Uncertainty." It appears in the respected journal Annals of Neurology. And 
Harris, 40, claims it has little if any connection to his two popular books. 
Believers, however, may draw their own conclusions - and may want to read his 
subsequent neurological studies even more carefully.

Related Articles
  

The current paper recovers Harris's identity as a doctoral candidate in 
neuroscience at UCLA, his occupation before he commenced what he calls his 
"extramural affair jumping into trenches in the culture wars." It is an 
addition to the growing field of brain scan trials, and Harris thinks it may be 
the first to detail how the brain processes belief. At first read, it seems 
less dangerous to Christianity than to another cherished pillar of Western 
thought - that "objective" beliefs like "2 + 2 = 4" and "subjective" beliefs 
like "torture is bad" belong to entirely separate categories of thought.

Harris and two co-authors ran 360 statements by 14 adult subjects whose brain 
activities were then scanned by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) 
devices. It suggests that within the brain pan, at least, the distinction 
between objective and subjective is not so clear-cut. Although more complex 
assertions may get analyzed in so-called "higher" areas of the brain, all seem 
to get their final stamp of "belief" or disbelief in "primitive" locales 
traditionally associated with emotions or taste and odor. Even "2 + 2 = 4," on 
some level, is a question of taste. Thus, the statement "that just doesn't 
smell right to me" may be more literal than we thought. 

Harris tested how the brain responded to assertions in seven categories: 
mathematical, geographic, semantic, factual, autobiographical, ethical and 
religious. All seven provided some useful data, but only the ones relating to 
math and ethics produced results clear enough to give a vivid picture of the 
way the simple and the complex, the subjective and the objective intertwine. 
Regardless of their content, statements that the subjects believed lit up the 
ventral medial prefrontal cortex (VMPC), a location in the brain best known for 
processing reward, emotion and taste. Equally "primitive" areas associated with 
taste, pain perception and disgust determined disbelief. "False propositions 
may actually disgust us," Harris writes.

Is there a practical application here? He speculates that if belief brain 
scanning were sufficiently refined it could act as an accurate lie detector and 
help control for the placebo effect in drug design. 

Harris says there is no critique of faith hidden somewhere in his brief paper. 
But his next neurological enterprise may be another matter. He is planning an 
fMRI run that will concentrate specifically on religious faith, which Harris 
thinks he now knows how to plumb more deeply. He also plans to set up two 
different subject groups - the faithful and non-believers. "That way," among 
other things, he says, "you can ask, 'Do believers believe that Jesus was born 
of a virgin the same way that nonbelievers believe that Chevrolet makes cars 
and trucks?'" It may turn out that the brain treats religious faith as its own 
special category of belief unlike ethics and math.

But that is not what Harris expects to find. He suspects the machines will show 
that "belief is belief is belief." And that conclusion, he admits, may put him 
at loggerheads with familiar foes. No one, he says, could accuse him or anyone 
else of trying to disprove God's existence on the basis of an fMRI. But faith 
is more vulnerable. "People who feel that religious faith is a singular 
operation of the brain - if they admit that it's an operation of the brain at 
all - would object to what I'm doing, since it may show that faith is 
essentially the same as other kinds of knowing or thinking. The whole thing 
will seem fishy to anyone who thinks we have immaterial souls running around in 
our bodies."

Which, of course, a lot of people do. And despite the fact that, as Harris puts 
it, his current literary mode "is not beach reading," they may find that they 
are keeping up with his academic writings more avidly - and nervously - than 
they do his bestsellers.

  
More fromCNN.com
  a.. Are you a 'cyberchondriac'?
  b.. Foster care better than orphanages for kids' IQs
  c.. Study links abortion and preemies
 
mediacare
http://www.mediacare.biz


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke