Do you understands the "most democratics" policy of "free press" in USA? And 
such a kind of policy still be used by the Indonesian government of the young 
generation AMN generals "reformation". We have American Dreams for Indonesia 
and we had crushed to shatered our own indepency in Oktober 1965. 


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Satrio Arismunandar 
  To: news Trans TV ; kampus tiga ; naratama naratama ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; ppiindia ; HMI Kahmi Pro 
Network ; pantau ; technomedia ; warta-lingk ; Forum Kompas ; sastra pembebasan 
; Pers Indonesia 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 4:17 AM
  Subject: [ppiindia] The Pulitzer-Winning Investigation That Dare Not Be 
Uttered on TV





  The Pulitzer-Winning Investigation That Dare Not Be Uttered on TV

  By Glenn Greenwald
  April 21, 2009 "Salon.com" -- The New York Times' David Barstow won a richly 
deserved Pulitzer Prize yesterday for two articles that, despite being featured 
as major news stories on the front page of The Paper of Record, were completely 
suppressed by virtually every network and cable news show, which to this day 
have never informed their viewers about what Bartow uncovered.  Here is how the 
Pulitzer Committee described Barstow's exposés:

  Awarded to David Barstow of The New York Times for his tenacious reporting 
that revealed how some retired generals, working as radio and television 
analysts, had been co-opted by the Pentagon to make its case for the war in 
Iraq, and how many of them also had undisclosed ties to companies that 
benefited from policies they defended.
  By whom were these "ties to companies" undisclosed and for whom did these 
deeply conflicted retired generals pose as "analysts"?  ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, 
CNN and Fox -- the very companies that have simply suppressed the story from 
their viewers.  They kept completely silent about Barstow's story even though 
it sparked Congressional inquiries, vehement objections from the then-leading 
Democratic presidential candidates, and allegations that the Pentagon program 
violated legal prohibitions on domestic propaganda programs.  The Pentagon's 
secret collaboration with these "independent analysts" shaped multiple news 
stories from each of these outlets on a variety of critical topics.  Most 
amazingly, many of them continue to employ as so-called "independent analysts" 
the very retired generals at the heart of Barstow's story, yet still refuse to 
inform their viewers about any part of this story.
  And even now that  Barstow yesterday won the Pulitzer Prize for investigative 
reporting -- one of the most prestigious awards any news story can win -- these 
revelations still may not be uttered on television, tragically dashing the hope 
expressed yesterday (rhetorically, I presume) by Media Matters' Jamison Foser 
that "maybe now that the story has won a Pulitzer for Barstow, they'll pay 
attention." Instead, it was Atrios' prediction that was decisively confirmed: 
"I don't think a Pulitzer will be enough to give the military analyst story 
more attention."  Here is what Brian Williams said last night on his NBC News 
broadcast in reporting on the prestigious awards:

  The Pulitzer Prizes for journalism and the arts were awarded today. The New 
York Times led the way with five, including awards for breaking news and 
international reporting.  Las Vegas Sun won for the public service category for 
its reporting on construction worker deaths in that city. Best commentary went 
to Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post, who of course was an on-air 
commentator for us on MSNBC all through the election season and continues to 
be. And the award for best biography went to John Meacham, the editor of 
Newsweek magazine, for his book "American Lion: Andrew Jackson in the White 
House."
  No mention that among the five NYT prizes was one for investigative 
reporting.  Williams did manage to promote the fact that one of the award 
winners was an MSNBC contributor, but sadly did not find the time to inform his 
viewers that NBC News' war reporting and one of Williams' still-featured 
premiere "independent analysts," Gen. Barry McCaffrey, was and continues to be 
at the heart of the scandal for which Barstow won the Pulitzer.  Williams' 
refusal to inform his readers about this now-Pulitzer-winning story is 
particularly notable given his direct personal involvement in the secret, joint 
attempts by NBC and McCaffrey to contain P.R. damage to NBC from Barstow's 
story, compounded by the fact that NBC was on notice of these multiple 
conflicts as early as April, 2003, when The Nation first reported on them. 
  Identically, CNN ran an 898-word story on the various Pulitzer winners -- 
describing virtually every winner -- but was simply unable to find any space 
even to mention David Barstow's name, let alone inform their readers that he 
won the Prize for uncovering core corruption at the heart of CNN's coverage of 
the Iraq War and other military-related matters.  No other television news 
outlet implicated by Barstow's story mentioned his award, at least as far as I 
can tell.
  The outright refusal of any of these "news organizations" even to mention 
what Barstow uncovered about the Pentagon's propaganda program and the way it 
infected their coverage is one of the most illuminating events revealing how 
they operate.  So transparently corrupt and journalistically disgraceful is 
their blackout of this story that even Howard Kurtz and Politico -- that's 
Howard Kurtz and Politico -- lambasted them for this concealment.  Meaningful 
criticisms of media stars from media critic (and CNN star) Howie Kurtz is about 
as rare as prosecutions for politically powerful lawbreakers in America, yet 
this is what he said about the television media's suppression of Barstow's 
story:  "their coverage of this important issue has been pathetic."
  Has there ever been another Pulitzer-Prize-winning story for investigative 
reporting never to be mentioned on major television -- let alone one that was 
twice featured as the lead story on the front page of The New York Times?  To 
pose the question is to answer it.
   
  UPDATE:  Media Matters has more on the glaring omissions in Brian Williams' 
"reporting" and on the pervasive impact of the Pentagon's program on television 
news coverage.  Williams' behavior has long been disgraceful on this issue, 
almost certainly due to the fact that some of the "analysts" most directly 
implicated by Barstow's story are Williams' favored sources and friends.
  On a different note, CQ's Jeff Stein responds today to some of the objections 
to his Jane-Harman/AIPAC/Alberto-Gonazles blockbuster story -- quite 
convincingly, in my view -- and, as Christy Hardin Smith notes, the New York 
Times has now independently confirmed much of what Stein reported.
  UPDATE II:  For some added irony:  on his NBS News broadcast last night 
suppressing any mention of David Barstow's Pulitzer Prize, Brian Williams' lead 
story concerned Obama's trip to the CIA yesterday.  Featured in that story was 
commentary from Col. Jack Jacobs, identified on-screen this way:  "Retired, NBC 
News Military Analyst."  Jacobs was one of the retired officers who was an 
active member of the Pentagon's "military analyst" program, and indeed, he 
actively helped plan the Pentagon's media strategy at the very same time he was 
posing as an "independent analyst" on NBC (h/t reader gc; via NEXIS).  So not 
only did Williams last night conceal from his viewers any mention of the 
Pentagon program, he featured -- on the very same broadcast -- "independent" 
commentary from one of the central figures involved in that propaganda program.
  On a related note, Howard Kurtz was asked in his Washington Post chat 
yesterday about  Mike Allen's grant of anonymity to a "top Bush official" that 
I highlighted on Saturday, and Kurtz -- while defending much of Allen's 
behavior -- said:  "I don't believe an ex-official should have been granted 
anonymity for that kind of harsh attack."
  Glenn Greenwald was previously a constitutional law and civil rights 
litigator in New York. He is the author of the New York Times Bestselling book 
"How Would a Patriot Act?," a critique of the Bush administration's use of 
executive power, released in May 2006. His second book, "A Tragic Legacy", 
examines the Bush legacy.
  © 2009 Salon.com

  Satrio Arismunandar 
  Executive Producer
  News Division, Trans TV, Lantai 3
  Jl. Kapten P. Tendean Kav. 12 - 14 A, Jakarta 12790 
  Phone: 7917-7000, 7918-4544 ext. 4034,  Fax: 79184558, 79184627
   
  http://satrioarismunandar6.blogspot.com
  http://satrioarismunandar.multiply.com  
   
  Verba volant scripta manent...
  (yang terucap akan lenyap, yang tertulis akan abadi...)

   

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke