http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=122488&d=14&m=5&y=2009
Thursday 14 May 2009 (19 Jumada al-Ula 1430)
Using women to get rid of poverty
Jonathan Power | Arab News
The secret key to driving down the rates of poverty and population growth
is female. To be absolutely precise, it is poor women living in the Third
World's rural backwaters, where 75 percent of the world's hungry scrape a
living. Everything else is a bit of a sideshow.
The last few years the number of rural women living in poverty has gone
up in both India and China, although during the latter half of the 1990s the
figures were falling. In Africa, although the numbers haven't gone up, the fall
in numbers is very modest. Only in Latin America and the Caribbean has there
been some marked improvement.
Too rapid population growth is one part of the problem, but even where it
is slowing - as in China - there has been a sharp jump in the number of
female-headed households. Changes in traditional values, the emigration of men
to look for work in the cities and overseas, increased family breakup, low
productivity and a deteriorating environment all are working to reinforce each
other.
In a number of countries the problem is exacerbated by a male-dominated
culture or by social instability resulting from conflict and war, civil
disturbance or over rapid industrialization.
Although women are a critical element of production in the rural economy
- in Africa women produce three-quarters of their families' food supply -
social custom usually subordinates them. Women's access to land is severely
constrained, yet in the rural economy only land of one's own gives access to
the means of production.
Islamic law grants land rights to women, but in daily life the threat of
divorce or other social sanctions encourage women to cede practical control of
their land to men. In Africa customary land systems often give married women
the right to a certain number of fields, but they must give priority to their
husband's fields and livestock.
Development has not favored women or the rural areas. Over the last
twenty years, according to the UN's Food and Agricultural Organization,
investment and aid allocated to rural areas has gone down by 20 percent. And
most crop and livestock projects are aimed at men. Project designers, bankers
and aid officials all too readily assume that women cannot afford to buy
improved seed, fertilizer and irrigation equipment. Nor can they repay loans.
These attitudes are based more on prejudice than fact. The repayment records of
poor women are often much superior to those of better-off borrowers.
Lack of education postpones the day of reform. A near billion earthlings
are illiterate and two thirds of them are women. Investment in women's
education is probably the single most cost-effective activity for any
government at any level of development.
To under-invest in women compounds every other mistake. Education and
economic opportunity can produce in triply disadvantaged women - in poor,
female and single parents - a triple multiplier effect - in the home, in
society and, not least, in nurturing the next generation.
Contrariwise, when women participate in economic life, population growth
is controlled. There is growing evidence that a woman's income and her degree
of control over household spending benefits her children's nutrition and
health. Thus, improving female opportunities and income lowers child mortality
and morbidity. Over the long run women will then have fewer children.
Access to land provides a similar benefit. If a woman can work for
herself, she will need fewer sons to assure her care if something happens to
her husband.
Tragically in many parts of the Third World, men are either absent,
seeking work in the city or the mines or traveling to distant lands, or simply
not pulling their weight. Men, when deprived off their traditional macho
activities such as war-fighting, political intrigue or hunting, often become
almost idle rather than putting their shoulder to the plow. The burdens of life
and well-being are thrown on women, who are not equipped by education, tools or
advice to realize their unfulfilled potential.
The answers to successful economic and social development, we all know,
are multi-faceted and complicated. But one thing is very clear: Take care of
women's poverty and education and then population growth and small-scale rural
economic growth will largely take care of themselves.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
