http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/06/200961923416905779.html

UPDATED ON:
Friday, June 19, 2009 
08:02 Mecca time, 05:02 GMT 


      Iran's Ayatollah under threat?  
     
       By Farzad Agah 
     
           
            Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's hold on power appears to be under threat 
[AFP] 

      Since Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared runaway winner of the presidential 
election last week, Iran has seen a daily wave of opposition demonstrations, 
police crackdowns and violence.

      Not since the 1979 Islamic Revolution when Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini 
overthrew the shah has Iranian society been so rattled and divided.

      According to the Iranian constitution, the Guardians of the Constitution 
are supposed to monitor and sign off on election results.

      After the votes have been counted and the winner announced by the 
interior ministry, the Guardians have the responsibility to endorse the result 
within 10 days if there are no complaints from the defeated candidates.

      The president-elect is then confirmed and later sworn in by Iran's 
supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

      But last week's election did not follow these procedures.

      Despite complaints by Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mehdi Karroubi and Mohsen 
Rezaei, the opposition candidates, Ayatollah Khamaenei congratulated 
Ahmadinejad in a public speech and pointed out that he had got 14 million votes 
more than the first time he was elected president four years ago.

      Opposition anger

           
            Mousavi and his supporters say the election was rigged [AFP] 
      The pronouncement, together with a self-congratulatory victory rally in 
which Ahmadinejad branded the supporters of the defeated candidates as 
"floating bushes", infuriated opposition supporters and they took to the 
streets in Tehran and other major cities.

      The establishment backed by militias and special forces beat 
demonstrators and arrested scores of prominent opposition figures, journalists, 
students and lawyers.

      Khamenei maintained his silence for two days before urging the opposing 
sides not to anger each other by making explosive comments at a private meeting 
of the candidates' representatives.

      He asked the opposition candidates to lodge their complaints to the 
Guardians of the Constitution for consideration - an indirect admission that 
the correct procedure had not been followed following the election.

      The Guardians of the Constitution later announced they would consider the 
complaints and admitted a partial recount of the election results may be 
necessary.

      Observers believe the moves by the conservative Guardians of the 
Constitution, who are known to support Ahmadinejad, were just to calm down 
anti-government supporters.

      Still, they have promised to meet all the defeated presidential 
candidates on June 20 and take all their complaints into consideration.

      Many moderate clerics, some of whom are believed to be members of the 
powerful Assembly of Experts, have questioned the wisdom of Khamenei in hastily 
endorsing Ahmadinejad's "victory".

      The Assembly, which selects the country's supreme leader, is chaired by 
Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani who is considered by many as one of the pillars of 
the Islamic Revolution.

      He was the man behind the election of Khamenei as supreme leader soon 
after the death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeni in 1989.

      In theory at least, the Assembly has the constitutional right to question 
and even replace the supreme leader.

      'Not impartial'

           
            Khamenei and Rafsanjani appear to be locked in a power struggle for 
influence in Iran [AP] 
      Some influential moderate clerics privately admit that Khamenei has not 
done "justice" to the presidential candidates and has not treated them with 
impartiality.

      This behaviour, they believe, could jeopardise his position as leader 
since one of the main qualities required of the supreme leader is "justice".

      Rafsanjani is also the chairman of the Expediency Council which is a body 
charged with the power to resolve differences or conflicts between parliament 
and the Guardians of the Constitution, but its true power lies more in its 
power to oversee the supreme leader.

      It is a well-known fact that there is a lot of bad blood between 
Ahmadinejad and Rafsanjani whom the president accuses of corruption and 
aristocratic behaviour.

      Ahmadinejad angered Rafsanjani when in his presidential television debate 
with Mousavi, he alleged that all the three opposition candidates had been put 
forward by Rafsanjani to defeat him.

      He further accused Rafsanjani of unlawfully accumulating massive wealth 
over many years and putting his cronies in the way of the president.

      The allegations prompted Rafsanjani to write a highly critical open 
letter to Khamenei, which the supreme leader ignored.

      Public rift

      The result has been serious public rift within the establishment and many 
observers believe Rafsanjani may be encouraging the ferment among supporters of 
the opposition presidential candidates.

      Mohammed Khatami, the former Iranian reformist president, has also been 
serving in the ranks of the "green movement" of Mousavi, who together with 
fellow candidate Karroubi, have been calling for the annulment of the election 
which they believe was rigged by Ahmadinejad supporters.

      All this leaves Khamenei in a very difficult situation.

      He is unlikely to either accuse the opposition supporters of being 
mercenaries of "foreign powers" as Ahmadinejad supporters have done.

      Nor is he likely to agree to their demand that the election result be 
cancelled or to have an impartial election fact-finding body set up.

      Instead, Khamenei, who is to give a sermon after Friday prayers at Tehran 
University, is likely to invite both sides to unite and accept the results of 
the votes or risk jeopardising the Islamic revolution and state.

      But Mousavi and his supporters are just as unlikely to stop their 
protests until they have achieved their goal.

      The deep frustration and disillusionment of the mainly urban supporters 
of Mousavi, together with the establishment rifts now out in the open, are 
posing a serious threat to Khamenei's authority.

      That may benefit Rafsanjani, who aspires to become the next supreme 
leader, and rumours abound that he is trying to muster support among some 
influential clerical members of the Assembly of Experts to take Khamenei to 
task.

      This may prove difficult, however, considering that there is still the 
well-armed and powerful Iranian Revolutionary Guard - that some say are the 
country's de facto rulers - to contend with.

      Farzad Agah is an Iranian journalist and analyst living in London. The 
views expressed by the author are not necessarily those of Al Jazeera.
     


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke