http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2203&Itemid=202

      An Indonesian Campaign to Save a Housewife
      Written by Ben Bland 
          
      Friday, 18 December 2009  
       
      Photo: Prita Mulysari, Jakarta GlobeWith a bank clerk facing ruin from a 
bizarre defamation suit, the Internet explodes to come to her rescue 

      There was nothing remarkable about Prita Mulyasari's decision to email a 
few friends to complain about the treatment she had received at a private 
hospital on the outskirts of Jakarta last year. On paying a lot of money for 
any particular service, whether it's health care, car repairs or plumbing, most 
people would grumble to their friends if they felt they'd got a raw deal.

      But when her friends forwarded the note, they unwittingly put into motion 
a chain of events that catapulted the 32-year-old bank worker from suburban 
anonymity into headline news and sparked a national outcry against the uneven 
nature of the justice system in Indonesia.

      Prita's email criticized Omni International Hospital and two of its 
doctors, who she claimed had misdiagnosed her as suffering from dengue fever 
when, in fact, she had mumps. She initially sent the note to just 20 friends, 
relatives and colleagues but once they began passing it on, it ended up being 
posted on a mailing list for doctors and was ultimately brought to the 
attention of the hospital.

      Their response wasn't what most people would think of as measured: Omni 
filed a civil defamation suit against the mother of two, while the two doctors 
launched a separate criminal defamation suit. After being charged with criminal 
defamation, Prita was locked up at the Tangerang women's penitentiary in May, 
at which time she was still breastfeeding her second child. News of her 
predicament had already begun seeping out through messages boards and social 
networking sites such as Facebook and the decision to jail her crystallized 
online curiosity into a rapidly-growing internet campaign. 

      The burgeoning public anger at the way she was being treated forced the 
authorities to release her from jail after three weeks on condition that she 
not abscond. Prita lost the civil case regardless and was ordered to pay Omni 
Rp204 million ($21,600) in damages - a decision upheld by a higher court 
earlier this month. 

      The good citizens of Indonesia - channeling their energies through 
Facebook and blogs - came to her aid once again, launching a "coins for Prita" 
campaign to raise the necessary funds to cover the damages and any associated 
legal costs. The campaign caught the public mood with everyone from politicians 
to businessmen and garbage scavengers to school children chipping in. By the 
time the collection drive closed on Monday, Prita's supporters had raked in 
well over Rp500 million, with many more donations still to arrive in Jakarta 
from elsewhere in the sprawling archipelago.

      Amid such overwhelming public support for Prita, the hospital finally 
realized that its reputation management efforts had rather backfired and, last 
week, it offered to drop its civil suit against Prita on the condition that her 
lawyer drops a Rp1 trillion countersuit. However, Prita has refused to settle 
with Omni unless the two doctors withdraw their support for the criminal 
prosecution, which is still in progress.

      Legal experts say that there is no mechanism to abandon a criminal trial 
once it is underway and the presiding judge told Prita on Tuesday that they 
would reach a verdict within two weeks. With the prosecutors having called for 
a six-month prison sentence, Prita's fate still hangs in the balance.

      Whatever the eventual outcome, the whole saga reveals a great deal - both 
positive and negative - about a country that, while undoubtedly on the way up, 
is still very much in transition.

      Living in a gated community outside Jakarta, Prita makes for a rather 
unlikely voice of the downtrodden. It seems bizarre that the malnourished and 
the poverty-stricken would hand over their hard-earned and much-needed cash to 
help out a middle-class bank employee who got into trouble by complaining about 
the service at her private hospital. But Prita's case has struck such a chord 
across Indonesia because it embodies just how corrupt and unfair most people 
perceive the justice system to be.

      In almost every country in the world, developing or developed, there is a 
widespread belief that the scales of justice are tipped massively in favor of 
the rich - just ask most Americans what they think about the OJ Simpson case or 
look at some of the recent scandals in Malaysia. 

      But in Indonesia, that sense is particularly acute and for good reason. 
Although successive governments have made some progress in the fight to root 
out the graft that permeated all areas of society under Suharto's rule, 
Indonesia remains one of the most corrupt nations in the world. Indonesia 
ranked 111th of 180 countries in the latest Corruption Perception Index by 
Transparency International, a well-respected anti-graft campaign group. And the 
justice system is widely considered to be the worst of a bad bunch. 

      Part of the problem stems from the proliferation of shady "case brokers" 
- known as "makelar kasus" or "markus" for short - who can halt arrests, 
intimidate witnesses and destroy evidence for an appropriate fee. 

      While the kleptomaniac oligarchs and money-grabbing politicians are 
rarely forced to justify their actions in a court of law, ordinary folk, who do 
not have the financial ammunition to block police investigations or pay off 
judges, are given no such quarter.

      Prita's case is only one of several recent causes celebres that have 
focused public attention on the problem. There is Minah, the illiterate 
55-year-old grandmother from central Java forced to face criminal charges after 
stealing three cocoa pods; West Jakarta resident Aguswandi Tanjung, who was 
arrested for "stealing electricity" after daring to charge his mobile phone in 
the hallway of the apartment block where he lives; and the two men from East 
Java who were remanded in custody for 70 days after stealing a solitary 
watermelon.

      Perhaps the extra cash collected by the coins for Prita campaign could go 
toward establishing a fund to help poor crooks buy their way out of trouble in 
the same way that Indonesia's moneyed felons do?

      That might not do much to restore popular faith in Indonesian justice but 
it would rebalance the scales a little while the county awaits the reforms that 
were promised by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono during the July elections 
and that helped him win a strong mandate from the people.

      In the meantime, there is always Facebook, which allows Indonesia's 
politically-active masses to protest from the comfort of their bedroom rather 
than sweating it out in one of the real-world demonstrations that take place 
almost every day at the Hotel Indonesia roundabout in central Jakarta. 

      Although as the Prita case shows only too well, the internet is not a 
one-way street for those seeking to air dissenting views. It is merely another 
arena in which battle can be joined. The internet may help save Prita in the 
end but it was the highly-contagious nature of electronic communications that 
got her into trouble in the first place.

      Ben Bland is a freelance journalist based in Jakarta. He blogs at 
http://www.asiancorrespondent.com/the-asia-file.
     


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke