http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/art-culture/18-the-lesson-of-karbala-am-05


The lesson of Karbala 
By Murtaza Razvi 
Friday, 25 Dec, 2009 

 
Shia Muslims perform during the festival of Ashura at the Imam Hussein shrine 
in Karbala, Iraq, More than any other event in Muslim history, the spirit 
inherent in the tragedy of Karbala defies injustice and coercion. -AP/ File 
photo 

So what has changed since Hussain's heroic refusal to endorse Yazid's tyranny 
in 680 AD? Very little, indeed, if truth be told uncoated. Yet more than any 
other event in Muslim history, the spirit inherent in the tragedy of Karbala is 
one that defies injustice and coercion - unto death if that's what it must take.

Repression and cruelty could not get Hussain, or indeed his survivors, to 
endorse the authoritarian order Yazid set out to impose. The assassination of 
Hussain and his companions at Karbala 61 years after the proclamation of Islam, 
which set a people enslaved by superstition and tribal tyranny free to bow only 
before one God, caused repulsion all around. It prompted a revolt in Hejaz led 
by Abdullah Ibn Zubair.

Yazid's army responded by sacking Madina and laying siege to Makkah. But the 
flame of human dignity and independence of action, as guaranteed by the new 
social contract that Islam had brought to Arabia, was rekindled by the martyrs 
at Karbala. It consumed Yazid within three years of the atrocity, and confined 
his reign of terror to oblivion.

What survived in the hearts and minds of the people was Hussain's refusal to 
endorse rule by terror. And that indeed is divine justice in action. Hypocrites 
and tyrants (kufi-o-shami) will come and go, as Iqbal says, but the perpetual 
reality (haqiqat-i-abadi), the spirit of defiance in the face of coercion that 
is Hussain, shall remain. The vanquished of yore is the hero of history and the 
historical victor has become synonymous with tyranny.

The new, revolutionary social contract that Islam gave to Arabia in the 7th 
century, and which Hussain salvaged, remains the ideal for Muslims to pursue 
around the world today. Though Muslims may largely continue to be ruled by 
autocratic regimes, their value system has not been obscured; bogus referendum 
and votes aside, no one, since the time of Yazid, has managed to get public 
endorsement of his autocratic rule.

A tyranny, in the form of the erstwhile Taliban rule in Afghanistan, may last 
awhile, but it must do so without the backing of the people. Closer home, ask 
the people of Swat who were subjected to repression and coercion by the 
Pakistani militants until last year, and they will tell you how blessed they 
feel having seen the back of their tormentors. Tyranny is called tyranny 
because it goes against the will of those on whom it is imposed; it cannot be 
justified under any pretext, garb or excuse - be it religious, secular or 
ideological.

Tyranny is all about self-aggrandisement and power play, and not the people it 
seeks to control for their own benefit. In our times, it has reared its head in 
varied forms, including military dictatorship by self-proclaimed messiahs, 
autocratic rule by elected representatives, bigotry and intolerance, extremism 
and, last but not least, the tele-evangelism of self-righteous preachers and 
anchors. It is also about whipping up mob psychology and the hysteria that 
causes the baying for blood of those labelled as heretics or accused of 
blasphemy, for instance.

What happened earlier this year to Christians in Gojra, and in 2007 to the 
Ahmadi community in Mandi Bahauddin, was no less than what happened on Ashura 
in the desert of Iraq centuries ago. The attacks by extremists on our shopping 
centres, vital installations, schools, mosques, imambargahs and other places of 
public gathering are equally repulsive. Analyst Hasan Nisar is right when he 
says that Muslim history is replete with shameful examples of genocide, murder 
and mayhem committed against fellow Muslims, not necessarily their religious 
adversaries. This calls for serious introspection.

Hussain had to die because he alone refused to live in denial of the fact that 
Yazid was establishing a tyranny, one that he would not endorse even though a 
majority of those around him chose to look the other way. The lesson of Karbala 
is to stand up to oppression and coercion at all times. The denial so prevalent 
in Pakistan today that no Muslim can indulge in causing the kind of death and 
destruction the Taliban and Al Qaeda are accused of unleashing on our cities 
must give way to the realisation that a bigger enemy lurks within. It must not 
be allowed to cow us into submission.

Intolerance, extremism and the coercion the militants seek to impose on society 
must be condemned, stood up against and disowned. Those who died in the desert 
of Iraq hundreds of years ago were innocent, just like those who die today when 
suicide bombers strike, killing and maiming our men, women and children. This 
tyranny, too, must be resisted.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke