http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/LA08Df02.html

Jan 8, 2010

General alert in Pakistan 
By Syed Saleem Shahzad 


ISLAMABAD - At a time when Islamabad is trying to implement a United 
States-sponsored initiative for a spirit of dialogue between Pakistan and 
India, an Indian general has stirred up a hornet's nest, eliciting a 
belligerent response from across the border. 

Indian General Deepak Kapoor, according to media reports, last week said in a 
closed-door seminar that his country could take on Pakistan and China 
simultaneously and "bring it to a satisfactory conclusion in 96 hours", and 
even suggested that a "limited war under a nuclear overhang" was possible in 
South Asia. 

Pakistan, tightly allied with the United States-led "war on terror" and tied 
down with its commitment to Washington to focus on its western border with 
Afghanistan rather than on India, chose not to officially respond to the Indian 
general's remarks. 

However, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Tariq 
Majeed, who by virtue of his designation becomes the operational head of all 
Pakistan's armed forces in the event of war, spoke out. 

"Leave alone China, General Deepak Kapoor knows very well what the Indian armed 
forces cannot do and what the Pakistani armed forces can pull off militarily 
... I have doubts that he can be so outlandish in strategic postulations as to 
put India on a self-destructive path," said Kapoor, known for his anti-American 
attitude. If the report were correct, he said, the uncalled-for rhetoric only 
depicted a lack of strategic acumen. 

Kapoor identified five thrust areas that would drive a new Indian doctrine. 

a.. While the armed forces prepare for their primary task of conventional wars, 
they must also factor in the eventuality of "a two-front war" breaking out. In 
tune with this, after acquiring a greater offensive punch along the entire 
western front with Pakistan by the creation of a new South-Western Army Command 
in 2005, India was now taking steps - albeit belatedly - to strategically 
counter the stark military asymmetry with China in the eastern sector. There is 
now "a proportionate focus towards the western and northeastern fronts". 

a.. The armed forces need to "optimize" their capability to effectively counter 
"both the military and non-military facets" of asymmetric and sub-conventional 
threats like weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, cyber warfare, electronic 
warfare and information warfare. 

a.. The armed forces have to substantially enhance their strategic reach and 
out-of-area capabilities to protect India's geopolitical interests stretching 
from the Persian Gulf to the Malacca Strait. "This would enable us to protect 
our island territories; and also give assistance to the littoral states in the 
Indian Ocean region." 

a.. Interdependence and operational synergy between the army, navy and air 
force must become the essence of strategic planning and execution in future 
wars. "For this, joint operations, strategic and space-based capability, 
ballistic missile defense and amphibious, airborne and air-land operations must 
be addressed comprehensively." 

a.. India must strive to achieve a technological edge over its adversaries. 
"Harnessing and exploitation of technology also includes integration of network 
centricity, decision-support systems, information warfare and electronic 
warfare into our operational plans." 

Pakistan's Majeed, a four-star general, was in mid-2008 twice offered the 
position of chief of army staff by former president Pervez Musharraf when 
Musharraf turned against the incumbent army chief, General Ashfaq Parvez Kiani. 
Each time, Majeed refused, as he prefers to stay in the background, although he 
has emerged as a leader on several issues. 

The bulk of the Pakistan army was against Asif Ali Zardari when he announced 
his decision to run for president, a position he assumed on September 9, 2008. 
Majeed, however, rallied the top brass, urging that the democratic process 
should be given a chance and that if the political forces wanted Zardari, their 
decision should be respected. 

Naturally, Zardari was thankful and offered to elevate Majeed, including to a 
position with complete command and control over all of the branches of the 
armed services. Majeed declined but continued to exert what influence he had. 

>From mid-2009, he was at the forefront of the initiative to start a dialogue 
>process with the Taliban, an issue he discussed with senior visiting US 
>military officials. This raised the ire of some sections of Pakistan's 
>strategic quarters which were closely allied with the American war in 
>Afghanistan. Some officers even boycotted Majeed's meeting with his American 
>counterpart, Admiral Mike Mullen, in violation of all protocols. 

However, Majeed continued to air his views, which emphasize dialogue with 
militants. He believes that the American war machine has been badly sucked into 
Afghanistan and that Pakistan should distance itself from being pulled into 
that quagmire. 

Gradually, Majeed's arguments have taken hold and in the past few weeks there 
have been some developments concerning Pakistan's dealings with the US. 

A stringent mechanism has been adopted in issuing visas to Americans, which has 
restricted American defense contractors in Pakistan. Their growing presence in 
the country has for some time been a bone of contention. US diplomats, too, 
have been under pressure, such as being forced to use regular immigration 
counters at airports. 

This does not mean that Pakistan overnight has become anti-American, or that 
its cooperation with the US will suddenly cease. These are critical times, 
though, for both the US and Pakistan, the former embroiled in Afghanistan, the 
latter struggling with spreading militancy, and what are now just trends could 
evolve into something bigger. 

Three important appointments in Pakistan this year could have an influence on 
such trends, including Majeed's sentiments. 

The director general of the Inter-Services Intelligence, Lieutenant General 
Shuja Pasha, is due to retire in March. The government has so far not shown any 
interest in extending his tenure. Army chief Kiani is due to step down in 
November. Washington is keen to see his term extended, as he dovetails 
perfectly with American policies on the region. Majeed, too, is slated to 
retire in October, which leaves him a matter of months to push his views. 

Syed Saleem Shahzad is Asia Times Online's Pakistan Bureau Chief. He can be 
reached at [email protected]


(Copyright 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please 
contact us about sales, syndication and republishing

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke