dcapwell commented on code in PR #2056:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/2056#discussion_r1068459440
##########
test/simulator/main/org/apache/cassandra/simulator/paxos/PairOfSequencesAccordSimulation.java:
##########
@@ -281,21 +211,151 @@ protected String preInsertStmt()
}
@Override
- Operation verifying(int operationId, IInvokableInstance instance, int
primaryKey, HistoryChecker historyChecker)
+ boolean allowMultiplePartitions() { return true; }
+
+ @Override
+ BiFunction<SimulatedSystems, int[], Supplier<Action>> actionFactory()
{
- return new VerifyingOperation(operationId, instance,
serialConsistency, primaryKey, historyChecker);
+ AtomicInteger id = new AtomicInteger(0);
+
+ return (simulated, primaryKeyIndex) -> {
+ int[] partitions = IntStream.of(primaryKeyIndex).map(i ->
primaryKeys[i]).toArray();
+ return () -> accordAction(id.getAndIncrement(), simulated,
partitions);
+ };
}
- @Override
- Operation nonVerifying(int operationId, IInvokableInstance instance, int
primaryKey, HistoryChecker historyChecker)
+ private static IIsolatedExecutor.SerializableCallable<SimpleQueryResult>
query(int id, int[] partitions, int[] readOnly)
{
- return new NonVerifyingOperation(operationId, instance,
serialConsistency, primaryKey, historyChecker);
+ return () -> execute(createAccordTxn(id, partitions, readOnly), "pk",
"count", "seq");
}
- @Override
- Operation modifying(int operationId, IInvokableInstance instance, int
primaryKey, HistoryChecker historyChecker)
+ public class ReadWriteOperation extends Operation
{
- return new ModifyingOperation(operationId, instance, ANY,
serialConsistency, primaryKey, historyChecker);
+ private final IntSet allPartitions;
+ private final IntSet readOnlySet;
Review Comment:
> We shouldn't have access to the read in Accord if we perform a blind write
either, as it shouldn't be returned to us since we didn't ask for it. We should
be verifying this behaviour, even if it is only a modest divergence.
I will update, I went this way as reading multiple rows is really annoying
in the CQL layer atm... If we had multi select statement support this feature
would be nicer...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
