aratno commented on PR #170: URL: https://github.com/apache/cassandra-website/pull/170#issuecomment-1796167688
It seems reasonable to me that someone preparing a patch for an EOL'd version might have to dig a bit deeper and re-build the docs for when that version was supported. Having in-tree docs would make that easier, since their checkout of the EOL'd release would include the docs at that point in time, but we could also include a link to the SHA of the docs before they were pruned for that EOL. Then contributors would clone the EOL'd branch, find the ref for the docs, and be able to build those themselves. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
