namedgraph commented on pull request #759: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/759#issuecomment-651639158
I understand the utility of `RDFParser` and `RDFDataMgr`. We don't want to force JAX-RS on Jena core, but we want Jena to be flexible enough to override all HTTP access. BTW JAX-RS is not remote only (if you mean client API) - it is a server/client framework and supports a uniform HTTP request/response API on both the server _and_ the client. Jena could benefit from that as its HTTP APIs are very "ad hoc". But more on the `FileManager` point: as long as it is used in `OntDocumentManager`, it should be a valid extension point. And as such it should not be deprecated nor can it really be internal. 3rd parties might need to supply their own implementations - as we do in order to override the HTTP access. Does it make sense? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@jena.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: pr-h...@jena.apache.org
