Aklakan opened a new pull request, #3264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/3264
As the title says. (If desired I can create an issue). The issue occurred to
me when I was trying to post process variable names in Ops after the optimizer
had already run. OpPropFunc arguments were not affected then.
One detail question is whether the NodeTransform should affect the property
function URI.
My argument against it are:
* Its probably desired to prevent a node transform from mapping a property
function name to a blank node or literal.
* Renaming property function names in the BGPs could be done before the
optimizer runs.
* In the work case, it would still possible to subclass TransformCopy just
for that case.
----
- [x] Tests are included.
- [x] Commits have been squashed to remove intermediate development commit
messages.
- (Key commit messages start with the issue number (GH-xxxx))
By submitting this pull request, I acknowledge that I am making a
contribution to the Apache Software Foundation under the terms and conditions
of the [Contributor's
Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html).
----
See the [Apache Jena "Contributing"
guide](https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@jena.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: pr-h...@jena.apache.org
