Panie Waldemarze
prosze zajrzec tutaj:
http://www.nejtillemu.com/conollydom0103.htm
http://www.eurocritic.demon.co.uk/bg-rsrc9.htm
http://www.bahnhof.se/~englund/emucon.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/et?ac=002549632124328&rtmo=lvvw7zzt&atmo=rrrrr
rrq&pg=/et/01/3/7/weuc07.html
At 07:49 AM 3/12/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Niezle... Jak widac integracja UE postapila dalej niz
>podejrzewalem... Unia przyswoila jak widac dorobek prawny ZSRR i
>Chin Ludowych... Teraz brakuje tylko obozow pracy...
>WD
>P.S. Czy moge prosic o odniesienie do informacji zrodlowej?
>
>
>
>roman kafel wrote:
>>
>> ISSUE 2112Wednesday 7 March 2001
>> Euro-court outlaws criticism of EU
>> By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels
>>
>> European Court of Justice
>> Now it's blasphemy to mock Europe [Dec '00] - The Spectator
>> Criticism of the EU [27 Nov '00] - The Stationery Office
>> Address by Bernard Connolly [29 Mar '96] - Centre Party of Sweden
>> Bernard Connolly - Bahnhof Internet
>> Star Chamber, Court of - Encyclopedia Britannica
>> Attainder - New Advent
>> Sacheverell, Henry [seditious libel] - The Columbia Encyclopedia
>> European Court of Human Rights
>>
>> THE European Court of Justice ruled yesterday that the European Union can
>> lawfully suppress political criticism of its institutions and of leading
>> figures, sweeping aside English Common Law and 50 years of European
>> precedents on civil liberties.
>> The EU's top court found that the European Commission was entitled to sack
>> Bernard Connolly, a British economist dismissed in 1995 for writing a
>> critique of European monetary integration entitled The Rotten Heart of
>> Europe.
>> The ruling stated that the commission could restrict dissent in order to
>> "protect the rights of others" and punish individuals who "damaged the
>> institution's image and reputation". The case has wider implications for
>> free
>> speech that could extend to EU citizens who do not work for the Brussels
>> bureaucracy.
>> The court called the Connolly book "aggressive, derogatory and insulting",
>> taking particular umbrage at the author's suggestion that Economic and
>> Monetary Union was a threat to democracy, freedom and "ultimately peace".
>> However, it dropped an argument put forward three months ago by the
>> advocate-general, Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, which implied that Mr
>> Connolly's criticism of the EU was akin to extreme blasphemy, and therefore
>> not protected speech.
>> Mr Connolly, who has been told to pay the European Commission's legal
costs,
>> said the proceedings did not amount to a fair hearing. He said: "We're back
>> to the Star Chamber and Acts of Attainder: the rights of defendants are not
>> respected or guaranteed in any way; the offence of seditious libel has been
>> resurrected."
>> Mr Colomer wrote in his opinion last November that a landmark British case
>> on
>> free speech had "no foundation or relevance" in European law, suggesting
>> that
>> the European Court was unwilling to give much consideration to British
legal
>> tradition.
>> Mr Connolly now intends to take his case to Europe's other court, the
non-EU
>> European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
