Hi Matt, Sent from my iPad
On 17 Sep 2012, at 19:09, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <[email protected]> wrote: > * 3.2 (Passwords - Preparation) :: I do wonder about the rationale for step > 2) (map all non-ASCII space to ASCII space). I myself have not run into > conditions where this would matter, but I mostly deal with US-based consumers > with passwords almost exclusively in the ASCII range. On the surface, it > seems a bit contradictory in principle to the "no bidi rule" rationale that > is included. I'm not advocating for retention or removal of step 2), but > rather for providing a rationale (one way or the other). This rule was always in SASLPrep, so this is trying to preserve some sort of backward compatibility. Whether it is a good enough reason to keep the rule - I don't know. _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
