I definitely agree with Peter and Marc. For decisions that essentially
involve the whole Unicode repertoire, some "customer advice" will be
appreciated. Ideally, that should happen on a mailing list, so that
others than the Expert Reviewer him/herself may be able to contribute.
Regards, Martin.
On 2012/09/20 4:42, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Hi Marc, that makes sense for subclasses. I'm not as concerned about
uses of the base classes, but there also I think that it would be good
to provide some guidance for our customers ("did you choose the right
Unicode normalization form, casemapping rules, and bidirectional
handling?"), so I'd be fine with Expert Review for both subclass
registrations and usage registrations.
Thanks for the feedback!
Peter
On 9/19/12 8:33 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
I think that Expert review is probably the best for any kind. The
main reason to me is to have someone to help the "customer", such as:
have you really thought about reusing one of the current defined
classes instead of creating a new one? have you thought about the
transition problem? … Kind of a way to interact with the
"customer" before too late. We do want to minimize the number of
sub-classes (or in general classes), therefore having an
"interception" mechanism would be useful.
Marc.
Le 2012-09-19 à 10:21, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
Currently, the RFC 5226 registration policy defined for subclasses
is "First Come, First Served". Do we think that a slightly higher
review standard is needed for subclasses, for instance "Expert
Review" or even "Specification Required"? Although in general I am
in favor of the lowest bar possible for registration, it strikes me
that for subclasses we might want something more than "First Come,
First Served" (IMHO "Expert Review" would be enough). For base
class usage registrations, I think "First Come, First Served" is
appropriate, although I would be open to "Expert Review" for those
registrations as well.)
Peter
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
