Hello Peter,
On 2012/09/28 8:42, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I don't think there will be false positives. Saying that e.g. IBM
and ＩＢＭ are should be two different things is simply crazy. So it
should be either width mapping, or the less basic forms (i.e.
full-width for Latin and half-width for Kana,...) should be
prohibited.
That all makes sense. It sounds as if we'll want to advise PRECIS
usages and subclasses to strongly consider performing width mapping.
Do you think it is so important that we ought to think about adding it
to the framework alongside casemapping and the other "first-class"
PRECIS rules?
I have to admit that I'm not very familiar with the details of PRECIS,
but I think yes, that would make sense.
Regards, Martin.
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
