-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Yoneya-san, that agenda looks good. Here is a bit of agenda-bashing and my thoughts on the various documents...
On 10/16/12 6:28 AM, Yoshiro YONEYA wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:22:44 +0900 Yoshiro YONEYA > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Following is draft agenda for IETF 85 Atlanta. Please send >> comments/additions/changes to the chairs. > > 1. Administrativia > > 2. Document updates / Discussion 2.1 WG I-Ds (1) Framework > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-framework/ In Atlanta I hope that we can have some discussion about whether to make width mapping a "full-class citizen" similar to casemapping and normalization (i.e., every class and subclass would need to specify if width mapping is required, recommended, or left up to the application protocol). Feedback would also be good on the IANA considerations. And of course we still need to do some testing. > (2) Preparation and Comparison of Nicknames > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-nickname This is very close to done. I've pinged a number of people in the SIP and XMPP communities for feedback. As a result, I expect to publish a small update before the cut-off date next Monday. I think it will be ready for WGLC at that point. > 2.2 Individual Documents (1) Mapping characters for PRECIS classes > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yoneya-precis-mappings/ I think it would be appropriate for the WG to adopt this item. Also see above about width mapping. > (2) Username and Password Preparation Algorithms > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-melnikov-precis-saslprepbis/ I > think it would be appropriate for the WG to adopt this item (as I recall, we had agreement about that in Vancouver but Alexey and I wanted to clean up a few aspects of the spec before publishing it as a WG item). We still need to get more feedback about this spec from the security community and various application communities that use SASL (IMAP, XMPP, etc.). (3) XMPP Address Format https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis/ This has been updated to align with the framework. This too is very close to done, and IMHO would be ready for WGLC in the XMPP WG (with cross-review from the PRECIS WG) soon after the Atlanta meeting (practically, we might want to run this LC after the LC on the nickname spec, but I leave that up to the PRECIS WG and XMPP WG chairs). (4) any updates to draft-nemoto-precis-framework-implement-report? > 3. Next steps Great reviews from lots of WG participants, widespread implementation, and universal deployment. ;-) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlB9cRwACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxU6QCdGp6fWk4SPlHraRloC37I3NTw 27AAoOKPdDfSdqt9hexBXd02KsG8UYFp =YWMH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
