Dear all,
Yoneya-san and I listed open issues for draft-ietf-precis-mappings.
Please read and give your comments/suggestions.
Followings are current mappings document's open issues.
1. Whether is local case mapping belong in additional mappings in precis
framework?
2. If local case mapping belong in precis framework, it's necessary to
specify mapping order
as local case mapping then case mapping.
Because it makes no sense to perform local case mapping after case
mapping.
3. Handling order of precis framework and precis mappings is ambiguous.
It's necessary to define the order in precis framework or in this
document or in both documents.
And followings are authors’ recommended solutions.
1. Additional mapping should be mappings which are not included in Mappings
document.
2. Handling order is Mappings document then processes in precis framework
document.
3. The order should be defined in both documents.
Regards,
Nemo
--
Takahiro Nemoto
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
