-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/19/13 7:22 AM, Matt Miller (mamille2) wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Matthew Wild <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 19 March 2013 12:23, Joseph Yee <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Peter Saint-Andre >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> On 3/18/13 7:03 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> On 18/03/2013 17:18, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>>>> During the WG session last week, I got the sense that >>>>>> people find the term "NameClass" misleading ("why can't I >>>>>> represent my name using the NameClass?!"). Thus I propose >>>>>> changing it to "SafeClass". Any objections? >>>>> >>>>> I like SafeClass much better. >>>> >>>> It's the best I could come up with on the plane yesterday. >>>> :-) >>>> >>>> My only concern is that people might think "safe" is some >>>> kind of guarantee that nothing bad could ever happen if they >>>> use the SafeClass... >>>> >>> >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> I have the same concern about SafeClass too. Can't think of a >>> better name, but don't see it as big concern. Probably just >>> more text needed to explain 'safe' under what condition. >>> >>> Just throwing names out from my brain... >>> >>> RestrictedClass? IdentifierClass? ResourceNamingClass? >> >> I was also going to suggest IdentifierClass just as your message >> came through. Many people already understand an 'identifier' to >> consist of characters from a restricted set (as in 99% of >> programming languages, and various protocols). Usernames usually >> draw from a similar set of characters in most systems. >> > > +1 to IdentifierClass. > > The suggestion that first came to my mind was probably worse: > BasicClass
Yeah, I thought of that one too. The idea behind SafeClass is that it's intended to be safe, just as the FreeClass is intended to be free. But IdentifierClass is OK with me. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRSHbYAAoJEOoGpJErxa2psdEP/jUmPzHxxiMUlRi7L9Rqi39f oDUIgyOfSoNo5EPLcVr2j5IsGayXpOGBVG5UN53aCvrsNxJXXOzD3RfLgxEbtojI UgmD4v2B7mvXKj+v8y6J+2577FfoN+A7jyMHY/6DC+fCK2pOesXXX+fU51hulaH1 MyJqYIpEvxm4vmTMcnCx/NphM2j3eTPAooRt0KceXiCSGY854wVwun4dUrwp805P JYyMeZHL7+55KVsYPuSNLy2VWuh/u2b2JWQLGz4f2pG+4CEJjFQCBHWPt6t7IlT2 Qb1ULcfjQSnlgVakOb8EgAsuNE8r4WuRPmcL0xW83tGBz9wv9dekpjH5krRpnI+9 HHYJrv5d2yBxKVkonDtpCxWB7lB94BA47c0sNdTe7qBeNEu+ugfVaNFGkUP52KjO l9m1IzEXjSYj9vZrfFETyujGOa3du3pHrwSvsIdiunBDL0QPgfkgI5LQ/kPe9GHn aTWGDFInN8NwKHVuZVU5kF5HJv1mAjAuT5eXm495twstiCoxWLKK/2RZ4LydH83V a2lw/3oI/ibIG/KeWWZs+oMPEHHVh7YQ7PNObZqzW5jYnVVwiVmlzREKyaNNBrYf MYN4dVq8wKXlOkaZQy5NCTvdCBEgeCNB6MoXqtCv7+8E3otiKEEStlp1cIsRJSDE UlpZyK/4xY/N2OR97BxW =a8cT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
