On 2013/07/11, at 5:03, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have received no feedback about the (IMHO small) ordering issues I > raised several weeks ago: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/precis/current/msg00456.html > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/precis/current/msg00459.html Hi Peter-san, My apologies for late reply. I compared precis derived property values that based on framework-09's ordering, and framework-08's values using my code. The only difference that I found was the change from 'PVALID' to 'ID_DIS or FREE_PVAL' in the character's value. The characters by these changes are more rigid for IdentifierClass. I think this new ordering is more preferable. Thanks. Nemo -- Takahiro Nemoto [email protected] > > Because the I-D submission deadline is fast approaching, I will soon > submit a revised I-D incorporating my proposed changes (as well as > numerous fixes to the codepoint table). We can discuss these as open > issues at IETF 87 in Berlin. > > Thanks! > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > _______________________________________________ > precis mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
