On 16 okt 2013, at 16:46, John C Klensin <[email protected]> wrote: > This is great. To a considerable extent, it reinforces the > utility and importance of the IDNA2008 approach.
Absolutely! Having the original IDNA locked with one version of Unicode is so weird I ask myself quite often how I could come up with that idea :-P Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
