Am 12.11.2013 03:15, schrieb Yoshiro YONEYA: > Dear all, > > As we discussed at WG meeting in Vancouver, the latest framework > document seemed fine but updated a lot since previous WG LC, so chairs > decided to perform WG LC again to the document. > > This message starts two weeks Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on > draft-ietf-precis-framework-11.txt (PRECIS Framework: Preparation and > Comparison of Internationalized Strings in Application Protocols). > <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-precis-framework-11.txt> > > Please review the document and send comments to the list ([email protected]), > the co-chairs ([email protected]), or the authors > ([email protected]) by the end of WGLC. > > The WGLC will end on Monday, Nov 25th. >
I've reread the draft in its entirety now that some time has passed. I have a few minor comments (some of them nits, which IMHO is a good sign), but overall I'm very pleased with it and think all feedback has been addressed. Generally I think we need to update the draft to Unicode 6.3. If we don't, at least the claims that Unicode 6.2 is the latest version at the time of writing should be removed ;). Section 4.1.1 claims width mapping is an aspect of NFKC. While this is true it is more generally an aspect of compatibility decomposition, and therefore happens when NFKD is employed. I think the text should reflect this. Section 4.1.3 right now says: «Use of the Unicode Default Case Folding algorithm is RECOMMENDED.» That statement is broader than we want it to be. Use of that algorithm is certainly recommended, but if and only if case-preservation is not desired. Section 7.11 says the category exempts printable 7-bit ASCII from other rules. This is untrue. The algorithm does this, utilizing the category. In Section 8 the paragraph preceding the actual algorithm should say "Exception*s*" instead of "Exception" in two places. Regards, Florian _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
