-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/5/13 7:37 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Florian Zeitz wrote: >> The terminology used in the RFC 5895 quote is definitely >> correct. However, for the PRECIS documents we might have to go on >> a case by case basis. >> >> There are (AFAIK) generally these different concepts: * >> "decomposition mapping": This is defined in the UnicodeData.txt >> file, and maps a single codepoint, to one or multiple codepoints >> (canonical mapping, and compatibility mapping are subtypes of >> this) > > Right, the Unicode database property name is > `Decomposition_Mapping`. In UAX15 long forms like "canonical > Decomposition_Mapping values" are used.
You are right. Sentences like "map to decomposition mappings" sound ugly, but let's use the correct term. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSoLCyAAoJEOoGpJErxa2p+kgP/2nwEgizuwCw+kjt1yNUNgmK ztW+Ro996GseY7T6Dcx1cOQAecIX2J6eXXcun+2NUFmBwTTX9UTuDByswLV4oFeF YEbSS63NZo4BWQrXt3jK2ny5Z8dVEQhcvmYUHcklGzoMi8rT/elL2Z/qNBVoXAMl CUFWOKf2p+PuHTnr6ulQGKNRdQ2lxbhP3cPIffna0RMOtGV/hHze55pTvXoQk6z2 SjH/VyYGZqs4+ZlROtPsVzfQt3LmUo6uqqNw5VHaOYrSTr4bVPvP1OyP81WvxVSn qVTiRAPBQqfCG6utV5moqrnzEjdDq/1ZlznYV8I/S8Sc6gICMmzRj4Sq3TlNeSbl LnRxVILxAAvtNbLt/igcsOaUA/XnwqfSw6FQO5OVUawl/fVHFaZONChy79kWOibN YcSw0SuEpSX19nLae45xVnpZu7GMZyrJCC72k0qhfJp+MEQDVOgrk5m7dA+oBf61 T5Igs+wL2hfpVFRF5DWDkac2r6GOP99CHm8ijV1C99ooXafe3TU1aXo6L+0v+CRL 3t5XFji18HPLnrdZ2kNPX8jqUVPZkNOcvAKubp4b1DfAmo5ZfqcsTmYp3RFtyVB9 NhRg9DA8tiNhF2p5jDCDt024/Wqpda5cwHOrrshKpPkmrceIWTdPA3iatOoxeVtd AIpx6NTZHQ+Sd18IBkiG =denZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
