On 2014/02/06, at 9:38, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> The framework document has a normative dependency on the mappings document. I > see 3 options: > > (1) change the reference to informative > > (2) change the mappings document to standards track > > (3) keep the mappings document informational and add to the list of > exceptions for dependency checking > > Does the WG have a preference? I like (3) best, followed by (2) and then (1). In my opinion, the mappings document is a supplementary guideline for the framework document, so I prefer to the keep the mappings document informational. However, local case mapping in the mappings document is an alternative to casemapping in the framework document, so I support (3) as well. Regards, Nemo > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > _______________________________________________ > precis mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
