Hi, Please see inline comments.
On Thu Apr 24 00:56:22 2014, [email protected] wrote: > On 4/22/14, 9:53 AM, Pearl Liang via RT wrote: > > (BEGIN IANA LAST CALL COMMENTS) > > > > IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: > > > > IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-precis-framework. Authors should > review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any > inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon as possible. > > > > IANA's reviewer has the following comments/questions: > > > > IANA has a few questions about the IANA actions requested in this > document. > > > > This document requests the creation of three registries in support > of the PRECIS Framework. As far as IANA can tell, there have never > been registries created for PRECIS in the past. > > Correct. > > > IANA Question --> should the three registries that are requested in > this document be combined into a singlee, high-level PRECIS master > registry where the three new registries would reside? > > That seems reasonable. > > These PRECIS registries are very similar to the IDNA registries: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/idna-tables- > 6.3.0.xhtml > > As much as possible, I would respectfully suggest that we follow the > same practices here as for the IDNA registries. > WOW. Are you saying that new versions of PRECIS Derived Property Values will be announced via a public notification mailing list, similar to the announcement for new version so Unicode? That idna table registry was setup, configured and coded by Marc's team. If that is the format, Marc's team needs to create that tool to generate every new version of this registry. > > Is PRECIS a brand new parameter, or a new protocol of an existing > one? > > PRECIS is a brand new protocol, similar to IDNA but applying more > generally. > > > If the former that PRECIS is a brand new parameter, what’s the exact > name of the new registry? Is Preparation and Comparison of > Internationalized Strings in Application Protocols? > > That seems good to me. > Can you please add this information in section 9 before 9.1? > > IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are > three actions which IANA must complete. > > > > First, IANA will create a new registry called the PRECIS Derived > Property Value Registry. This new registry will contain the Derived > Properties for the versions of Unicode that are released after (and > including) version 6.3 of Unicode. The derived property value is to > be calculated in cooperation with a designated expert [RFC5226] > according to the rules specified under Section 7 and Section 8 in > the current document. The registry will only be created when a > designated expert is made available to assist IANA in the > initiation of the registry. Changes to the rules that are used to > generate the table of derived property values, and thus the > registry itself, are done through IETF Review as defined by RFC > 5226. > > > > QUESTION: Are the authors intended to get an DE before IESG > Approval? > > Pete Resnick is following up on this. > Sure. > > Second, IANA will create a new registry called the PRECIS Base > Classes Registry. This new registry has a registration template in > the document submitted for approval. Maintenance of the registry > will be through RFC Required, as defined in RFC 5226. > > > > There are two initial registrations in the registry, as follows: > > > > Base Class: FreeformClass. > > Description: A sequence of letters, numbers, symbols, spaces, and > > other code points that is used for free-form strings. > > Specification: Section 3.3 of [ RFC-to-be ]. > > > > Base Class: IdentifierClass. > > Description: A sequence of letters, numbers, and symbols that is > > used to identify or address a network entity. > > Specification: Section 3.3 of [ RFC-to-be ]. > > Correct, except the second instance of "Section 3.3" is incorrect in > the > I-D and should be "Section 3.2". > > > Third, IANA will create a new registry called the PRECIS Profiles > Registry. This new registry has a registration template in the > document submitted for approval. Maintenance of the registry will > be through Expert Review, as defined in RFC 5226. > > > > IANA Question -> Are there to be any initial registrations in the > new PRECIS Profiles Registry? > > No. However, just so you are aware, registrations are forthcoming in > the > following I-Ds: > > draft-ietf-precis-nickname > draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis > draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis > No, we do not know and we have no way to track what registrations are tied to what I-Ds. So, it'd be helpful if: - the authors of those I-Ds identify this document draft-ietf-precis-framework in the IC section for reference. We mainly focus on the IC section and will notice related I-Ds if they are being cited in the section. - the precis WG chairs can help to coordinate all I-Ds that will update the same registry. > > IANA understands that these three actions are the only ones that > need to be completed upon approval of this document. > > Agreed. > > > Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed > > until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. > > This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Pearl Liang > > Thank you, Pearl! > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
