> On 4 Dec 2014, at 04:06, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is that kind of text specific enough for you?
Yes. > I think we need to define this at the level of the application protocol > because that's where the rubber meets the road and where we can legitimately > talk about the various entities involved (at the level of the PRECIS > framework we don't know what the entities are and what their responsibilities > are). I would say "ok" to the precis document if there is text added that say explicitly that that kind of text MUST be in an application specific document that reference the precis doc. I.e. without text like that, it is very dangerous what is specified. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
