Hello,
 I submitted just at the very last minute last friday a proposal for a BOF, 
described below. Credits to Dave Thaler for the name of the BOF (LUCID). My 
first proposal was RIP (Revision of IDNA and Precis). 

Regards, Marc.

Name: Locale-free UniCode? <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/UniCode> 
Identifiers (LUCID)
Description: IAB has recently issued a statement about issues found by the use 
of some class of code points in the IDNA protocol and also applies to any 
identifier. The IAB expects that the IETF investigate ways to address this 
problem. Work could be done in existing wg such as precis or elsewhere. The 
purpose of the BOF is to define a plan. 
Agenda: something like: 1) Problem statement and scope 2) possible ways to 
address the problem 3) next steps in IETF.
Status: WG Forming
Responsible AD: Barry Leiba
BoF proponents: Marc Blanchet <​[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>>
BoF chairs: TBD
Number of people expected to attend: 40
Length of session (1, 1.5, 2, or 2.5 hours): 1 hour
Conflicts to avoid (whole Areas and/or WGs): precis, apparea
Does it require Meetecho? Yes
Links to the mailing list, draft charter if any, relevant Internet-Drafts, etc.
Mailing List: ​​[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
(temporarily)
Draft charter: ​None yet.
Relevant documents:
​https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2015-2/iab-statement-on-identifiers-and-unicode-7-0-0/
 
<https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2015-2/iab-statement-on-identifiers-and-unicode-7-0-0/>
draft-klensin-idna-5892upd-unicode7 
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-idna-5892upd-unicode70>0

_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis

Reply via email to