On 25 Feb 2015, at 16:39, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
Hi Ben, thanks for the review! You've been a reviewing machine lately
- must be getting in shape for IESG duty. ;-)
Yep. But it seems like you are an author on all of them ;-)
On 2/25/15 2:50 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
[…]
- 3.4, third bullet: "… protocols that do not use SASL …"
should this paragraph include "and follow the recommendations in this
document" or "and that reuse this profile"? clause
Well, sure. :) But we can't legislate for people who aren't reading
this specification (i.e., this isn't a BCP).
I only mentioned it because the other two bullets included it.
— 6
The text refers to the 4013 as SASLPrep. But this draft is _also_
SASLPrep, isn't it? At least, it has SASLPrepbis in the short title.
(Or
does the term saslprep get dropped entirely when the draft becomes an
RFC?)
The latter. The original document name had "saslprepbis" in it and we
have't changed it in all this time.
Okay, got it!
/Ben
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
